EVALUATING A MODEL FOR PREDICTING NUTRIENT-UPTAKE BY RICE DURING VEGETATIVE GROWTH

被引:14
作者
TEO, YH
BEYROUTY, CA [1 ]
GBUR, EE
机构
[1] UNIV ARKANSAS, DEPT AGRON, FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 USA
[2] UNIV ARKANSAS, AGR STAT LAB, FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400060030x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Since submerged soils create a unique chemical environment from which roots take nutrients, models that estimate nutrient uptake for upland crops may differ from those for rice (Oryza sativa L.). A mathematical model that had been used to predict nutrient uptake by corn (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine mar. (L.) Merr.], and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) was evaluated for predicting uptake by rice under flooded soil conditions. Our objectives were to evaluate such a model for rice and to conduct greenhouse and growth chamber studies to measure the soil and plant parameters required by the model. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to determine the parameters most influencing N, P, and K uptake. Two soils [Crowley silt loam (Typic Albaqualfs) and Calhoun silt loam (Typic Glossaqualfs)] and three rice cultivars (Lemont, Katy, and Mars) were selected for this study. Linear regression of predicted vs. observed uptake for N, P, and K gave satisfactory fits to the data with R2 values of 0.48, 0.99, and 0.88, respectively. The slopes of the lines for predicted vs. observed uptake for N and K were 1.01 and 0.94, respectively, and the relationships did not depend upon either soil or cultivar. However, the prediction of P did depend on cultivar. The slopes of the lines for predicted vs. observed P uptake by Mars, Lemont, and Katy were 1.81, 1.08, and 1.02, respectively. The parameters most affecting N uptake were root growth rate, N concentration in the soil solution, and the half-distance between root axes. However, parameters most influencing P and K uptake were root growth rate, root radius, and maximal influx rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1064 / 1070
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, PROPERTIES GASES LIQ
[2]  
Barber S. A., 1984, SOIL NUTRIENT BIOAVA
[3]  
Barber SA, 1981, MODELING WASTE WATER, P382
[4]   THE DETERMINATION OF IONIC-DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS IN FIELD SOILS .1. DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENTS IN SIEVED SOILS IN RELATION TO WATER-CONTENT AND BULK-DENSITY [J].
BARRACLOUGH, PB ;
TINKER, PB .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1981, 32 (02) :225-236
[5]   PHOSPHATE IN MALAYSIAN ULTISOLS AND OXIDOLS AS EVALUATED BY A MECHANISTIC MODEL [J].
BIDIN, AA ;
BARBER, SA .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1985, 139 (06) :500-504
[6]   SOIL-PH AND PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM UPTAKE BY MAIZE EVALUATED WITH AN UPTAKE MODEL [J].
CHEN, JH ;
BARBER, SA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1990, 54 (04) :1032-1036
[7]   POROUS CUP SOIL-WATER SAMPLER WITH VOLUME CONTROL [J].
CHOW, TL .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1977, 124 (03) :173-176
[8]  
CLAASSEN N, 1975, THESIS PURDUE U W LA
[9]  
CLAASSEN N, 1976, AGRON J, V68, P961
[10]   DIFFUSION OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF PHOSPHORIC ACID AT 25-DEGREES [J].
EDWARDS, OW ;
HUFFMAN, EO .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1959, 63 (11) :1830-1833