Perceived quality in higher education: an empirical study

被引:46
作者
Calvo-Porral, Cristina [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Levy-Mangin, Jean-Pierre [2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Novo-Corti, Isabel [3 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ A Coruna, Fac Econ & Empresa, La Coruna, Spain
[2] Univ Quebec, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ A Coruna, La Coruna, Spain
[4] Univ A Coruna, Econ Anal & Business Adm Dept, La Coruna, Spain
[5] Univ A Coruna, Econ, La Coruna, Spain
[6] Univ Outaouais, Sci Adm Mkt Dept, Gatineau, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Tolouse, Sci Econ, Toulouse, France
[8] Univ Tolouse, Int Cooperat Law, Toulouse, France
[9] Univ Paris, Econ Management, Paris, France
[10] Univ A Coruna, Econ Anal & Business Adm Dept, La Coruna, Spain
关键词
Higher education; Perceived quality; SERVPERF; SERVQUAL; University;
D O I
10.1108/MIP-11-2012-0136
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to address two issues. First research goal is about analyzing differences in perceived quality in higher education (HE) between a private and a public university centre. Second, the research aims to analyze which are the key dimensions in perceived quality in HE from the students' standpoint. Design/methodology/approach - An analysis based on a modified SERVQUAL instrument was used to respond to the objectives put forward. Then, a mean comparison and covariance structure analysis approach was carried out to test the differences in perceived quality between the students from both centres, as well as the dimensions with higher influence in perceived quality. Findings - The results suggest that tangibility and empathy dimensions are the most influent variables on perceived quality in HE. Furthermore, some relevant significant differences were found between the public and the private centre. Research limitations/implications - The results give an opportunity to HE institutions' managers to develop enhancing quality strategies for their institutions, given that the present study relies on a sample of actual undergraduate university students. Originality/value - The present research provides with a comparative analysis between a private and a public centre, in order to assess which one offers higher educational and teaching quality from the students' viewpoint, as well as an approach to the main variables in HE perceived quality.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 619
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF [J].
Abdullah, Firdaus .
MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2006, 24 (01) :31-47
[2]   HEdPERF versus SERVPERF The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector [J].
Abdullah, Firdaus .
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2005, 13 (04) :305-+
[3]   Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared [J].
Abdullah, Firdaus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & METHOD IN EDUCATION, 2006, 29 (01) :71-89
[4]  
Al-Alak B., 2012, AUSTR J BASIC APPL S, V6, P56
[5]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[6]   Service quality in postgraduate education [J].
Angell, Robert ;
Heffernan, Troy ;
Megicks, Phil .
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2008, 16 (03) :236-+
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INT J QUAL RELIA MAN, DOI DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000006070
[8]   ON THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS IN EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGNS [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
YI, YJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (03) :271-284
[9]  
Baron S., 2000, QUAL ASSUR EDUC, V8, P85, DOI DOI 10.1108/09684880010325600
[10]  
Bollen K, 1989, VILLEY SERIES PROBAB