National self-image as an obstacle to ensuring children's rights in the context of domestic violence and family law - the case of Sweden

被引:6
作者
Bruno, Linnea [1 ]
机构
[1] Malardalen Univ, Sch Hlth Care & Social Welf, Eskilstuna, Sweden
关键词
Child contact; familialisation; gendered responsibility; joint custody; selective repression; racialisation; Swedish welfare state; violent fathers;
D O I
10.1080/09649069.2018.1519156
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to highlight and discuss contradictions and challenges in the current policy and practice regarding fathers' violence towards mothers and children in the Swedish welfare state. In particular, professional discourses and understandings of domestic violence in disputes about contact, custody, residence and maintenance, following parental separation, are analysed. My research suggests that abusers find ways to manipulate professionals and get them unwittingly to enable their continued control of victimised mothers and children. One conclusion is that oppression is maintained through processes of familialisation and selective repression. These discursive practices reproduce intersectional inequalities and, in doing so, in many cases result in the administration rather than prevention of further violence.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 440
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Alanen L, 1994, CHILDHOOD MATTERS, P27
[2]  
Alinia M., 2013, HONOUR RELATED VIOLE
[3]  
[Anonymous], VALFARDENS GRANSER V
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TRACING WOMEN FRIEND
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OVERGREPP MOT KVINNO
[6]   The material and the symbolic in theorizing social stratification: issues of gender, ethnicity and class [J].
Anthias, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 52 (03) :367-390
[7]   Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis [J].
Anthias, Floya .
ETHNICITIES, 2013, 13 (01) :3-19
[8]  
ars vardnadsutredning, 2017, 20176 SOU
[9]   Degendering the problem and gendering the blame - Political discourse on women and violence [J].
Berns, N .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 2001, 15 (02) :262-281
[10]  
Branigan E, 2004, HIS MONEY OUR MONEY