AIRWAY PRESSURE RELEASE VENTILATION DURING ACUTE LUNG INJURY - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER TRIAL

被引:0
作者
RASANEN, J
CANE, RD
DOWNS, JB
HURST, JM
JOUSELA, IT
KIRBY, RR
ROGOVE, HJ
STOCK, MC
机构
[1] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,CHICAGO,IL 60611
[2] UNIV CINCINNATI,MED CTR,DEPT SURG,CINCINNATI,OH 45267
[3] UNIV HELSINKI,CENT HOSP,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,SF-00290 HELSINKI 29,FINLAND
[4] UNIV FLORIDA,J HILLIS MILLER HLTH CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,GAINESVILLE,FL 32610
[5] RIVERSIDE METHODIST HOSP,CRITICAL CARE SERVICES,COLUMBUS,OH 43214
[6] EMORY UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,ATLANTA,GA 30322
关键词
LUNG; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; ADULT; PULMONARY DISEASE; RESPIRATION; ARTIFICIAL; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; VENTILATION; MECHANICAL; INJURY; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) in providing ventilatory support to patients with acute lung injury of diverse etiology and mild-to-moderate severity. Design: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized crossover trial. Setting: ICUs in six major referral hospitals. Patients: Fifty adult patients with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and positive end-expiratory airway pressure. Interventions: After optimization of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), conventional ventilation and APRV were administered sequentially for 30 mins. During APRV, the CPAP level and airway pressure release level were adjusted to prevent hypoxemia, while the degree of ventilatory support was adjusted by altering the frequency of pressure release. Measurements and Main Results: Circulatory and ventilatory pressures, arterial blood gases and pH, heart rate, and respiratory rate were measured. Alveolar ventilation was augmented adequately in 47 of 50 patients by APRV. Adjustment of APRV required an increase in mean CPAP from 13 +/- 3 (SD) to 21 +/- 9 cm H2O and a release pressure of 6 +/- 5 cm H2O. This airway pressure pattern produced a mean airway pressure comparable to that pressure achieved during conventional ventilation. Failure of APRV in three patients could be attributed to an inadequate level of CPAP or an inadequate APRV rate. While maintaining oxygenation of arterial blood and circulatory function, APRV allowed a substantial (55 +/- 17%; p < .0001) reduction in peak airway pressure compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation adjusted to deliver a comparable or lower level of ventilatory support. Conclusions: APRV is a feasible alternative to conventional mechanical ventilation for augmentation of alveolar ventilation in patients with acute lung injury of mild-to-moderate severity.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1241
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条