External and internal factors influencing self-directed online learning of physiotherapy undergraduate students in Sweden: a qualitative study

被引:22
作者
Hammarlund, Catharina Sjodahl [1 ,2 ]
Nilsson, Maria H. [1 ]
Gummesson, Christina [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Lund, Sweden
[2] Kristianstad Univ, Sch Hlth & Soc, PRO CARE Grp, Kristianstad, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Ctr Teaching & Learning, Fac Med, Lund, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS | 2015年 / 12卷
关键词
Communication; Cooperative behavior; Learning; Perception; Physiotherapy;
D O I
10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.33
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Online courses have become common in health sciences education. This learning environment can be designed using different approaches to support student learning. To further develop online environment, it is important to understand how students perceive working and learning online. The aim of this study is to identify aspects influencing students' learning processes and their adaptation to self-directed learning online. Methods: Thirty-four physiotherapy students with a mean age of 25 years (range, 21 to 34 years) participated. Qualitative content analysis and triangulation was used when investigating the students' self-reflections, written during a five week self-directed, problem-oriented online course. Results: Two categories emerged: 'the influence of the structured framework' and 'communication and interaction with teachers and peers.' The learning processes were influenced by external factors, e.g., a clear structure including a transparent alignment of assignments and assessment. Important challenges to over-come were primarily internal factors, e.g., low self-efficacy, difficulties to plan the work effectively and adapting to a new environment. Conclusion: The analyses reflected important perspectives targeting areas which enable further course development. The influences of external and internal factors on learning strategies and self-efficacy are important aspects to consider when designing online courses. Factors such as pedagogical design, clarity of purpose, goals, and guidelines were important as well as continuous opportunities for communication and collaboration. Further studies are needed to understand and scaffold the motivational factors among students with low self-efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
  • [2] Learning and cognitive styles in Web-based learning: Theory, evidence, and application
    Cook, DA
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (03) : 266 - 278
  • [3] Student models of learning and their impact on study strategies
    Ferla, Johan
    Valcke, Martin
    Schuyten, Gilberte
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (02) : 185 - 202
  • [4] Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
    Gielen, Sarah
    Peeters, Elien
    Dochy, Filip
    Onghena, Patrick
    Struyven, Katrien
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2010, 20 (04) : 304 - 315
  • [5] Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature
    Gikandi, J. W.
    Morrow, D.
    Davis, N. E.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 57 (04) : 2333 - 2351
  • [6] Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
    Graneheim, UH
    Lundman, B
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2004, 24 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [7] Self-efficacy and strategies to influence the study environment
    Jungert, Tomas
    Rosander, Michael
    [J]. TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 15 (06) : 647 - 659
  • [8] Kropf D.C., 2013, EUROPEAN J OPEN DIST, V16, P13
  • [9] Li N, 2010, US CHINA ED REV, V7, P26
  • [10] Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review
    Mann, Karen
    Gordon, Jill
    MacLeod, Anna
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 14 (04) : 595 - 621