Governing Forest Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Environmental Governance: A Review

被引:15
作者
Adhikari, Shankar [1 ]
Baral, Himlal [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Forests & Environm, Dept Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Jalan CIFOR, Bogor 16115, Barat, Indonesia
来源
ENVIRONMENTS | 2018年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
forest; ecosystem services; governance; management;
D O I
10.3390/environments5050053
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governing forest ecosystem services as a forest socio-ecological system is an evolving concept in the face of different environmental and social challenges. Therefore, different modes of ecosystem governance such as hierarchical, scientific-technical, and adaptive-collaborative governance have been developed. Although each form of governance offers important features, no one form on its own is sufficient to attain sustainable environmental governance (SEG). Thus, the blending of important features of each mode of governance could contribute to SEG, through a combination of both hierarchical and collaborative governance systems supported by scientifically and technically aided knowledge. This should be further reinforced by the broad engagement of stakeholders to ensure the improved well-being of both ecosystems and humans. Some form of governance and forest management measures, including sustainable forest management, forest certification, and payment for ecosystem services mechanisms, are also contributing to that end. While issues around commodification and putting a price on nature are still contested due to the complex relationship between different services, if these limitations are taken into account, the governance of forest ecosystem services will serve as a means of effective environmental governance and the sustainable management of forest resources. Therefore, forest ecosystem services governance has a promising future for SEG, provided limitations are tackled with due care in future governance endeavors.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Abolina E, 2013, ENV POLICY IS SOCIAL, P63
[2]   Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal [J].
Acharya, KP .
INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2002, 4 (02) :149-156
[3]   Governance for sustainability: towards a 'thick' analysis of environmental decisionmaking [J].
Adger, WN ;
Brown, K ;
Fairbrass, J ;
Jordan, A ;
Paavola, J ;
Rosendo, S ;
Seyfang, G .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2003, 35 (06) :1095-1110
[4]   Adaptation to Climate Change in Panchase Mountain Ecological Regions of Nepal [J].
Adhikari, Shankar ;
Baral, Himlal ;
Nitschke, Craig .
ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 5 (03) :1-18
[5]  
Alamgir Mohammed, 2014, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V10, P112, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2014.919961
[6]  
[Anonymous], EC HUM WELL BEING BI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J COMMUNITY LIVELIHO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GOVERNING MARKETS FO, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT1NPQTR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[10]   Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management [J].
Armitage, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 35 (06) :703-715