SOME ARGUMENTS AGAINST PRIVATE-PRACTICE

[1] BARTLETT H, 1958, SOC WORK, V3, P5

[2] BECK BM, 1958, NASW PRIVATE PRACTIC

[3] COHEN N, 1957, SOCIAL WORK YB 1957, P559

[4] FORMALIZING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS AND SOCIAL AGENCIES [J]. SOCIAL CASEWORK, 1959, 40 (10): : 539 - 544

[5] KORET S, 1958, SOC WORK, V3, P11

[6] LOWY L, 1960, SOC WORK, V5, P97

[7] PEEK J, 1951, SMITH COLLEGE STUDIE, V21, P196

[8] RAPOPORT L, 1960, SOCIAL SERVICE REV, V34, P63

[9] THE FAMILY AGENCY AND THE PRIVATE CASEWORK PRACTITIONER [J]. SOCIAL CASEWORK, 1959, 40 (10): : 531 - 538

[10] SIPORIN M, 1961, SOC WORK, V6, P52

[1] BARTLETT H, 1958, SOC WORK, V3, P5

[2] BECK BM, 1958, NASW PRIVATE PRACTIC

[3] COHEN N, 1957, SOCIAL WORK YB 1957, P559

[4] FORMALIZING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS AND SOCIAL AGENCIES [J]. SOCIAL CASEWORK, 1959, 40 (10): : 539 - 544

[5] KORET S, 1958, SOC WORK, V3, P11

[6] LOWY L, 1960, SOC WORK, V5, P97

[7] PEEK J, 1951, SMITH COLLEGE STUDIE, V21, P196

[8] RAPOPORT L, 1960, SOCIAL SERVICE REV, V34, P63

[9] THE FAMILY AGENCY AND THE PRIVATE CASEWORK PRACTITIONER [J]. SOCIAL CASEWORK, 1959, 40 (10): : 531 - 538

[10] SIPORIN M, 1961, SOC WORK, V6, P52