Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study

被引:14
作者
Bawahab, Mohammed A. [1 ]
Abd El Maksoud, Walid M. [1 ]
Alsareii, Saeed A. [2 ]
Al Amri, Fahad S. [1 ]
Ali, Hala F. [1 ]
Nimeri, Abdul Rahman [2 ,3 ]
Al Amri, Abdul Rahman M. [2 ]
Assiri, Adel A.
Aziz, Mohammed I. Abdul [4 ]
机构
[1] King Khalid Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg Dept, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
[2] Najran Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Najran 1988, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sheikh Khalifa Med City, Gen Surg Dept, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[4] Abha Private Hosp, Gen Surg, Abha 61431, Saudi Arabia
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH | 2014年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
acute cholecystitis; routine drainage; cholecystectomy; subhepatic collection;
D O I
10.7555/JBR.28.20130095
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Many surgeons practice prophylactic drainage after cholecystectomy without reliable evidence. This study was conducted to answer the question whether to drain or not to drain after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. A retrospective review of all patients who had cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, was conducted from April 2010 to April 2012. Data were extracted from hospital case files. Preoperative data included clinical presentation, routine investigations and liver function tests. Operative data included excessive adhesions, bleeding, bile leak, and drain insertion. Complicated cases such as pericholecystic collections, mucocele and empyema were also reported. Patients who needed therapeutic drainage were excluded. Postoperative data included hospital stay, volume of drained fluid, time of drain removal, and drain site problems. The study included 103 patients allocated into two groups; group A (n = 5 38) for patients with operative drain insertion and group B (n = 5 65) for patients without drain insertion. The number of patients with preoperative diagnosis of acute non-complicated cholecystitis was significantly greater in group B (80%) than group A (36.8%) (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly longer in group A. All patients who were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy were in group A. Multivariate analysis revealed that hospital stay was significantly (P < 0.001) longer in patients with preoperative complications. There was no added benefit for prophylactic drain insertion after cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis in non- complicated or in complicated cases.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 245
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Ammori Basil J, 2003, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, V10, P303, DOI 10.1007/s00534-002-0807-6
  • [2] Diez J A, 1990, HPB Surg, V3, P5, DOI 10.1155/1990/37926
  • [3] DOUGHERTY SH, 1992, CURR PROB SURG, V29, P561
  • [4] G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
    Faul, Franz
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    Lang, Albert-Georg
    Buchner, Axel
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) : 175 - 191
  • [5] Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Gurusamy, K. S.
    Samraj, K.
    Mullerat, P.
    Davidson, B. R.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (04):
  • [6] Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated open cholecystectomy
    Gurusamy, K. S.
    Samraj, K.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (02):
  • [7] THE EFFECT OF DRAINS IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    HAWASLI, A
    BROWN, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 1994, 4 (06): : 393 - 398
  • [8] Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karliczek, A
    Jesus, EC
    Matos, D
    Castro, AA
    Atallah, AN
    Wiggers, T
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 8 (04) : 259 - 265
  • [9] Evidence-based analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage
    Launay-Savary, M. -V.
    Slim, K.
    [J]. ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2006, 131 (05): : 302 - 305
  • [10] Mutter D, 1999, J CHIR-PARIS, V136, P117