COHERENCE, PROPER BASICALITY AND MORAL ARGUMENTS FOR THEISM

被引：0

作者：

SESSIONS, WL

机构：

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/BF00136012

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：119 / 137

页数：19

共 18 条

[1] HAS FOUNDATIONALISM BEEN REFUTED [J].

ALSTON, WP .

[2]

[Anonymous], 1982, CANADIAN J PHILOS, VXII

[3] PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONALISM [J].

AUDI, R .

[4]

DEBURGH WG, 1938, 1938 GIFF LECT ST AN

[5]

EMERSON RW, 1957, SELECTIONS, P153

[6]

FOLEY R, 1979, AM PHILOS QUART, V16, P247

[7]

Plantinga, 1979, RATIONALITY RELIG BE, P7

[8] IS BELIEF IN GOD PROPERLY BASIC [J].

PLANTINGA, A .

NOUS, 1981, 15 (01) :41-51

[9]

Plantinga A., 1983, FAITH RATIONALITY, P16, DOI DOI 10.1093/0195131932.001.0001

[10]

POLLOCK JL, KNOWLEDGE JUSTIFICAT, P102