Does regional anaesthesia improve outcome after surgery?

被引:5
作者
Fischer, Barrie [1 ]
Bosch, Oscar Domingo [1 ]
机构
[1] Worcestershire Acute Hosp NHS Trust, Worcester, England
关键词
Epidural; regional anaesthesia; regional analgesia; spinal; stress response; surgical outcome;
D O I
10.1016/j.mpaic.2015.08.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
There is conclusive evidence that regional anaesthesia provides better postoperative analgesia than systemic opioid techniques. Regional anaesthesia also has the potential to improve the functional outcome from surgery, although proving this in a clinically relevant way is challenging; many studies are inconclusive with methodological weaknesses making comparison difficult and offering conflicting evidence. Systematic reviews offer better evidence that regional anaesthesia improves outcome but both anaesthetic and surgical practice have evolved over time, so older data may not be relevant to current practice. Regional anaesthesia improves outcome only when incorporated into a structured postoperative rehabilitation and recovery programme (enhanced recovery), using the effective analgesia provided to achieve specific targets. These targets include early mobilization, active physiotherapy and early return to enteral nutrition. Other benefits of regional anaesthesia (reduced blood loss, lower risk of thromboembolic events and duration of ileus) also contribute to a reduction in postoperative morbidity. However, unless the postoperative recovery programme is modified to incorporate these benefits into a patient's recovery, the full impact of regional anaesthesia on surgical outcome will not be realized.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 577
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Do we need to justify epidural analgesia beyond pain relief? [J].
Barrington, Michael J. ;
Scott, David A. .
LANCET, 2008, 372 (9638) :514-516
[2]   Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia - A meta-analysis [J].
Block, BM ;
Liu, SS ;
Rowlingson, AJ ;
Cowan, AR ;
Cowan, JA ;
Wu, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (18) :2455-2463
[3]   Adding regional analgesia to general anaesthesia: increase of risk or improved outcome? [J].
Curatolo, Michele .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (07) :586-591
[4]   Benefits, Risks, and Best Practice in Regional Anesthesia Do We Have the Evidence We Need? [J].
Fischer, Barrie .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (06) :545-548
[5]   Does regional anaesthesia really improve outcome? [J].
Kettner, S. C. ;
Willschke, H. ;
Marhofer, P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 :90-95
[6]  
Lirk P, 2014, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V80, P610
[7]   Effect of postoperative analgesia on major postoperative complications: A systematic update of the evidence [J].
Liu, Spencer S. ;
Wu, Christopher L. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (03) :689-702
[8]   Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter? [J].
Luger, T. J. ;
Kammerlander, C. ;
Gosch, M. ;
Luger, M. F. ;
Kammerlander-Knauer, U. ;
Roth, T. ;
Kreutziger, J. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 :S555-S572
[9]   Protective Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal and Thoracic Surgery A Meta-Analysis [J].
Poepping, Daniel M. ;
Elia, Nadia ;
Marret, Emmanuel ;
Remy, Camille ;
Tramer, Martin R. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2008, 143 (10) :990-999
[10]   Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials [J].
Rodgers, A ;
Walker, N ;
Schug, S ;
McKee, A ;
Kehlet, H ;
van Zundert, A ;
Sage, D ;
Futter, M ;
Saville, G ;
Clark, T ;
MacMahon, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7275) :1493-1497