UTILITY MAXIMIZATION WITH INTERMEDIATE CONSUMPTION UNDER RESTRICTED INFORMATION FOR JUMP MARKET MODELS

被引:13
|
作者
Ceci, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ G Dammunzio, Dipartimento Econ, Vle Pindaro 42, I-65127 Pescara, Italy
关键词
Utility maximization; filtering; backward stochastic differential equations; jump processes;
D O I
10.1142/S0219024912500409
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The contribution of this paper is twofold: we study power utility maximization problems (with and without intermediate consumption) in a partially observed financial market with jumps and we solve by the innovation method the arising filtering problem. We consider a Markovian model where the risky asset dynamics S-t follows a pure jump process whose local characteristics are not observable by investors. More precisely, the stock price process dynamics depends on an unobservable stochastic factor X-t described by a jump-diffusion process. We assume that agents' decisions are based on the knowledge of an information flow, {G(t)}(t is an element of[0,T]), containing the asset price history, {F-t(S)}(t is an element of[0,T]). Using projection on the filtration G(t), the partially observable investment-consumption problem is reduced to a full observable stochastic control problem. The homogeneity of the power utility functions leads to a factorization of the associated value process into a part depending on the current wealth and the so called opportunity process J(t). In the case where G(t) = F-t(S), J(t) and the optimal investment-consumption strategy are represented in terms of solutions to a backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE) driven by the F-S-compensated martingale random measure associated to (St), which can be obtained by filtering techniques (Ceci, 2006; Ceci and Gerardi, 2006). Next, we extend the study to the case G(t) = F-t(S) boolean OR F-t(eta), where eta(t) gives observations of X-t in additional Gaussian noise. This setup can be viewed as an abstract form of "insider information". The opportunity process J(t) is now characterized as a solution to a BSDE driven by the G(t)-compensated martingale random measure and the so called innovation process. Computation of these quantities leads to a filtering problem with mixed type observation and whose solution is discussed via the innovation approach.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Utility maximization in a jump market model
    Morlais, Marie-Amelie
    STOCHASTICS-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROBABILITY AND STOCHASTIC PROCESSES, 2009, 81 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [2] Arbitrage and utility maximization in market models with an insider
    Huy N. Chau
    Wolfgang J. Runggaldier
    Peter Tankov
    Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2018, 12 : 589 - 614
  • [3] Arbitrage and utility maximization in market models with an insider
    Chau, Huy N.
    Runggaldier, Wolfgang J.
    Tankov, Peter
    MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 12 (04) : 589 - 614
  • [4] Robust utility maximization for complete and incomplete market models
    Gundel, A
    FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2005, 9 (02) : 151 - 176
  • [5] Robust utility maximization for complete and incomplete market models
    Anne Gundel
    Finance and Stochastics, 2005, 9 : 151 - 176
  • [6] Exponential utility maximization under partial information
    Mania, Michael
    Santacroce, Marina
    FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2010, 14 (03) : 419 - 448
  • [7] Exponential utility maximization under partial information
    Michael Mania
    Marina Santacroce
    Finance and Stochastics, 2010, 14 : 419 - 448
  • [8] Forward Backward SDEs Systems for Utility Maximization in Jump Diffusion Models
    Santacroce, Marina
    Siri, Paola
    Trivellato, Barbara
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND OPTIMIZATION, 2024, 89 (03):
  • [9] A BSDE arising in an exponential utility maximization problem in a pure jump market model
    Mereu, Carla
    Stelzer, Robert
    STOCHASTICS-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROBABILITY AND STOCHASTIC PROCESSES, 2017, 89 (01) : 240 - 258
  • [10] On utility maximization in discrete-time financial market models
    Rasonyi, M
    Stettner, L
    ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2005, 15 (02): : 1367 - 1395