Understanding the role of representation in interorganizational knowledge integration A case study of an IT outsourcing project

被引:6
作者
Werr, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Runsten, Philip [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Management, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Sch Econ, Org Studies Organisat, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Sch Econ, Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Interorganizational learning; Knowledge integration; Knowledge sharing; Outsourcing implementation; Learning organizations; Knowledge management;
D O I
10.1108/09696471311303764
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The current paper aims at contributing to the understanding of interorganizational knowledge integration by highlighting the role of individuals' understandings of the task and how they shape knowledge integrating behaviours. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a framework of knowledge integration as heedful interrelating. Knowledge integration is conceptualized as help seeking, help giving and reflective reframing, and the paper discusses how these knowledge integrating behaviors are shaped by actors' representations of the situation and their role in it. The framework is illustrated and refined in relation to a qualitative case study of an IT outsourcing project. Findings - Narrow and separating representations of actors' roles, partly based on institutionalized ideas of the proper behaviors of "buyers" and "suppliers", impede knowledge integration. Such representations render the knowledge integrating behaviors help seeking, help giving and reflective reframing illegitimate. Research limitations/implications - Results call for attention to actors' representations of the situation and their role in it in order to understand knowledge integration. The interorganizational setting, with its institutionalized roles, provides unique challenges that need to be investigated further. As findings are based on a single case study, further research needs to extend the findings to other kinds of interorganizational collaboration. Originality/value - The paper adds to the understanding of interorganizational knowledge integration by drawing attention to the importance of individual actors' representations and behaviors. Hereby, the dominant organizational and network levels of analysis in the literature on interorganizational knowledge integration are complemented by an individual level of analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships
    Barringer, BR
    Harrison, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (03) : 367 - 403
  • [2] Towards understanding the roles of social capital in knowledge integration: A case study of a collaborative information systems project
    Bhandar, Mamata
    Pan, Shan-Ling
    Tan, Bernard C. Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (02): : 263 - 274
  • [3] ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION
    COHEN, WM
    LEVINTHAL, DA
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) : 128 - 152
  • [4] Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex
    de Boer, M
    Van den Bosch, FAJ
    Volberda, HW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1999, 36 (03) : 379 - 398
  • [5] De Man A.-P., 2005, European Management Journal, V23, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2005.04.009
  • [6] Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation
    Dougherty, D
    Takacs, CH
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2004, 37 (06) : 569 - 590
  • [7] BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH
    EISENHARDT, KM
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) : 532 - 550
  • [8] Enberg C., 2007, KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATIO
  • [9] Coordinating expertise in software development teams
    Faraj, S
    Sproull, L
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (12) : 1554 - 1568
  • [10] A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation
    Flatten, Tessa C.
    Engelen, Andreas
    Zahra, Shaker A.
    Brettel, Malte
    [J]. EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 29 (02) : 98 - 116