Two questions about the nature of imagination

被引:0
作者
Spinicci, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
来源
BOLLETTINO FILOSOFICO | 2018年 / 33卷
关键词
Imagination; Theory of Faculties; Phenomenology;
D O I
10.6093/1593-7178/5913
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to focus on a particular subject - imagination - in order to set limits and to underscore the validity of a phenomenological understanding of our experience. Imagination is, first of all, a general heading under which we comprehend a range of psychological faculties, whose adaptive meaning (still poorly understood) deserve to be analyzed from a naturalistic point of view. Under the same heading we are used to understand a variety of social and individual activities, of playful gestures and utterances, which belong to the realm of meaning and which deserve to be analyzed and clarified from a descriptive point of view. Phenomenology, as a description of the meaning of our personal experience, has here its possible field of application.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 159
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Boyd B., 2010, ORIGIN STORIES EVOLU, DOI 10.2307/j.ctvjf9xvk
  • [2] Currie G., 2002, RECREATIVE MINDS IMA
  • [3] de Condillac E. Bonnot, 1970, TRATTATO SENSAZIONI
  • [4] Gottschall J., 2015, LISTINTO DI NARRARE
  • [5] Husserl E, 1968, RICERCHE LOGICHE
  • [6] Husserl Edmund, 2002, IDEE FENOMENOLOGIA P
  • [7] McDowell J, 1998, MEANING KNOWLEDGE RE, P295
  • [8] Piana G., 2004, SULLA FANTASTICHERIA
  • [9] Piana Giovanni., 1979, ELEMENTI DOTTRINA ES
  • [10] Wittgenstein L., 1999, DELLA CERTEZZA