FOSINOPRIL PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS IN CHRONIC AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENTS

被引:0
作者
GEHR, TWB [1 ]
SICA, DA [1 ]
GRASELA, DM [1 ]
FAKHRY, I [1 ]
DAVIS, J [1 ]
DUCHIN, KL [1 ]
机构
[1] BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB,PHARMACEUT RES INST,DEPT HUMAN PHARMACOL,PRINCETON,NJ
关键词
FOSINOPRIL; FOSINOPRILAT; CAPD; ACE-INHIBITOR; PHARMACOKINETICS; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fosinoprilat, the diacid of fosinopril sodium, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, were investigated after the oral administration of 10 mg of fosinopril sodium to 6 chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. The results from 1 patient are reported separately because of the presence of concomitant liver dysfunction. The mean t1/2, C(max), t(max), and AUC values for 5 of the CAPD patients were 19.5 h, 202 ng.ml-1, 4.8 h, and 3.19-mu-g.h.ml-1, respectively. Values for 1 CAPD patient with liver dysfunction were t1/2 of 65.4 h, C(max) of 182 ng.ml-1, t(max) of 9 h, and AUC of 18.1-mu-g.h.ml-1. Peritoneal clearance of fosinoprilat was negligible, ranging from 0.07 to 0.23 ml.min-1. Serum ACE activity remained significantly suppressed at 24 and 48 h after fosinopril sodium administration with mean decreases from baseline of 94.2% and 70.6%, respectively. ACE activity was suppressed to an even greater degree in the patient with liver dysfunction, remaining 97% inhibited 72 h after drug administration. Plasma renin activity (PRA) increased and plasma aldosterone concentrations decreased following drug administration. Mean arterial pressure did not change appreciably throughout the study. Dosage reductions may not be necessary in the majority of dialysis patients.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 169
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COAGULATION ABNORMALITIES IN CHRONIC PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS
    JONES, CL
    ANDREW, M
    EDDY, A
    ONEIL, M
    SHALOM, NI
    BALFE, JW
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 1990, 4 (02) : 152 - 155
  • [32] INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY IN THE CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENT
    PAULS, DG
    BASINGER, BB
    SHIELD, CF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1992, 20 (05) : 497 - 499
  • [33] Pharmacodynamics of menatetrenone and effects on bone metabolism in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients
    Sugimoto, T
    Yamakado, M
    Matsushita, K
    Iwamoto, T
    Tagawa, H
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 30 (06) : 566 - 575
  • [34] NUTRITION ASPECTS OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS - A REVIEW
    ZARLING, EJ
    GOTTLIEB, K
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 1994, 13 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [35] ACUTE ABDOMEN IN CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS (CAPD)
    COLOMBI, A
    NIEREN-UND HOCHDRUCKKRANKHEITEN, 1994, 23 : S137 - S140
  • [36] 1,25-DIHYDROXYCHOLECALCIFEROL AND PERITONEAL MACROPHAGE CHEMOTAXIS IN PATIENTS ON CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS
    CHAN, PCK
    IP, MSM
    PUN, KK
    NEPHRON, 1991, 59 (03): : 434 - 439
  • [37] PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENTS
    CHANG, JJ
    YEUN, JY
    HASBARGEN, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1995, 25 (02) : 297 - 301
  • [38] 10 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS
    ROTELLAR, C
    BLACK, J
    WINCHESTER, JF
    RAKOWSKI, TA
    MOSHER, WF
    MAZZONI, MJ
    AMIRANZAVI, M
    GARAGUSI, V
    ALIJANI, MR
    ARGY, WP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1991, 17 (02) : 158 - 164
  • [39] Pharmacokinetics of intermittent intraperitoneal cefazolin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients
    Manley, HJ
    Bailie, GR
    Asher, RD
    Eisele, G
    Frye, RF
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 19 (01): : 65 - 70
  • [40] THE EFFECT OF DWELL TIME ON PERITONEAL PHAGOCYTIC DEFENSE OF CHRONIC PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS PATIENTS
    VLAANDEREN, K
    DEFIJTER, CWH
    BOS, HJ
    VANDERMEULEN, J
    BEELEN, RHJ
    OE, PL
    VERBRUGH, HA
    ADVANCES IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, VOL 5, 1989: SELECTED PAPERS FROM THE NINTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, 1989, 5 : 151 - 153