The Death and Life of Collaborative Planning Theory

被引:19
作者
Goodspeed, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, A Alfred Taubman Coll Architecture & Urban Planni, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
URBAN PLANNING | 2016年 / 1卷 / 04期
关键词
collaborative planning theory; communicative action; Jurgen Habermas; planning theory;
D O I
10.17645/up.v1i4.715
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
It has been over 20 years since Judith Innes proclaimed communicative action to be the "emerging paradigm" for planning theory, a theoretical perspective which has been developed into what is known as collaborative planning theory (CPT). With planning theory shifting to a new generation of scholars, this commentary considers the fate of this intellectual movement within planning. CPT never achieved the paradigmatic status its advocates desired because of its internal diversity and limited scope. However, its useful combination of analytical and normative insights is attracting the interest of a new generation of researchers, who are subjecting it to rigorous empirical testing and addressing longstanding theoretical weaknesses. Like Jane Jacob's classic book The Death and Life of Great American Cities, CPT has made an enduring impact on planning theory, even as it has failed to achieve a total revolution in thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条