EVALUATION OF INHIBITION RESPONSE BEHAVIOR USING THE GO/NO-GO PARADIGM IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS: EFFECTS OF VARIATIONS IN THE TASK DESIGN

被引:7
|
作者
Rezvanfard, Mehrnaz [1 ,2 ]
Golesorkhi, Mehrshad [3 ,4 ]
Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh [3 ]
Safaei, Hooman [1 ]
Eghbali, Aiden Nasiri [2 ]
Alizadeh, Hanieh [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ekhtiari, Hamed [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, INCAS, Neurocognit Lab, Tehran, Iran
[2] Rah E Roshan Addict Treatment Ctr, Karaj, Iran
[3] Inst Cognit Sci Studies, Translat Neurosci Program, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Neuroimaging & Anal Grp, Res Ctr Mol & Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
关键词
No-Go/Go; executive functions; inhibitory control; psychophysics;
D O I
10.5604/17307503.1227530
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Inhibitory control is an important executive function and a deficiency in action inhibition has been characterized as core in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. The Go/No-Go (GNG) paradigm is a wellknown method to evaluate an inhibitory response. We developed seven versions of the GNG to evaluate the effect of different psychometric properties on GNG scores in normal healthy subjects. Material/Methods: Fifty seven healthy subjects including 38 (66.7%) males, aged 18 to 55 (mean +/- SD: 33.7 +/- 8.1) participated in this study. Each subject conducted seven variants of GNG tasks in a randomized order after being given instruction to respond to a selected stimulus displayed on a screen by pressing the space bar as quickly as possible (Go stimuli) and withholding responses to other stimuli (No-Go stimuli). To develop seven versions of varying difficulty, we manipulated the task context by making changes in stimulus complexity, stimulus presentation time, inter-stimulus intervals and the probability of target occurrence. Results: Decreasing the stimulus presentation time and simultaneously using more complex stimuli caused a significant decrease in true hits on Go trials, which is a good marker for response initiation, while an increase in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to a decrease in commission errors in No-Go trials, which is a good marker of response inhibition. Further analysis revealed that reaction time and age did not influence the GNG task scores while education level and gender may affect scores of Go trials but not No-Go trials. Conclusions: Manipulation in both stimulus complexity and presentation time caused significant changes in response initiation scores, while alteration in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to significant changes in motor inhibition scores. Optimization of GNG tasks to measure response inhibition and initiation could be achieved with psychometric manipulation on various features of stimulus presentation for different target populations.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 366
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks, demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent
    Simmonds, Daniel J.
    Pekar, James J.
    Mostofsky, Stewart H.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (01) : 224 - 232
  • [42] Interaction between behavioral inhibition and emotional processing in borderline personality disorder using a pictorial emotional go/no-go paradigm
    Sinke, Christopher
    Wollmer, M. Axel
    Kneer, Jonas
    Kahl, Kai G.
    Kruger, Tillmann H. C.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 256 : 286 - 289
  • [43] Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency
    Sander Nieuwenhuis
    Nick Yeung
    Wery van den Wildenberg
    K. Richard Ridderinkhof
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2003, 3 : 17 - 26
  • [44] Mapping effects in choice-response and go/no-go variants of the lexical decision task: A case for polarity correspondence
    Wuehr, Peter
    Heuer, Herbert
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 75 (03): : 491 - 507
  • [45] Visual Recognizability Evaluation for Brand Logos Using Covert Eye Tracking (CovET) Combined with a Go/No-go Task
    Yamanaka, Otoha
    Nibe, Rina
    Nakazawa, Kenta
    Yamamoto, Yuki
    Kawai, Wakana
    Kyutoku, Yasushi
    Dan, Ippeita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [46] Cardiac timing and threatening stimuli influence response inhibition and ex-Gaussian parameters of reaction time in a Go/No-go task
    Yang, Xiao
    Spangler, Derek P. P.
    Jennings, J. Richard
    Friedman, Bruce H. H.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 60 (06)
  • [47] Response Inhibition and Error Monitoring during a Visual Go/No-Go Task in Inuit Children Exposed to Lead, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, and Methylmercury
    Boucher, Olivier
    Burden, Matthew J.
    Muckle, Gina
    Saint-Amour, Dave
    Ayotte, Pierre
    Dewailly, Eric
    Nelson, Charles A.
    Jacobson, Sandra W.
    Jacobson, Joseph L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 120 (04) : 608 - 615
  • [48] How does Go/No-Go training lead to food devaluation? Separating the effects of motor inhibition and response valence
    Houben, Katrijn
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2023, 37 (04) : 763 - 776
  • [49] CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS, IMPULSIVITY, AND ADOLESCENCE: EFFECTS OF CIRCADIAN MISALIGNMENT ON THE NEURAL RESPONSE DURING THE GO/NO-GO TASK IN HUMAN ADOLESCENTS
    Logan, R. W.
    Shafer, A. R.
    Ngari, W.
    Hasler, B. P.
    SLEEP, 2018, 41 : A99 - A99
  • [50] ASSESSING INHIBITION-RELATED FUNCTIONAL NETWORKS IN A GO/NO-GO TASK USING TIME-FREQUENCY PHASE-SYNCHRONY
    Harper, Jeremy B.
    Olson, Lacy A.
    Kothur, Srikant
    Burwell, Scott J.
    Aviyente, Selin
    Malone, Stephen M.
    Bernat, Edward M.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 : S99 - S99