EVALUATION OF INHIBITION RESPONSE BEHAVIOR USING THE GO/NO-GO PARADIGM IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS: EFFECTS OF VARIATIONS IN THE TASK DESIGN

被引:7
|
作者
Rezvanfard, Mehrnaz [1 ,2 ]
Golesorkhi, Mehrshad [3 ,4 ]
Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh [3 ]
Safaei, Hooman [1 ]
Eghbali, Aiden Nasiri [2 ]
Alizadeh, Hanieh [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ekhtiari, Hamed [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, INCAS, Neurocognit Lab, Tehran, Iran
[2] Rah E Roshan Addict Treatment Ctr, Karaj, Iran
[3] Inst Cognit Sci Studies, Translat Neurosci Program, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Neuroimaging & Anal Grp, Res Ctr Mol & Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
关键词
No-Go/Go; executive functions; inhibitory control; psychophysics;
D O I
10.5604/17307503.1227530
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Inhibitory control is an important executive function and a deficiency in action inhibition has been characterized as core in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. The Go/No-Go (GNG) paradigm is a wellknown method to evaluate an inhibitory response. We developed seven versions of the GNG to evaluate the effect of different psychometric properties on GNG scores in normal healthy subjects. Material/Methods: Fifty seven healthy subjects including 38 (66.7%) males, aged 18 to 55 (mean +/- SD: 33.7 +/- 8.1) participated in this study. Each subject conducted seven variants of GNG tasks in a randomized order after being given instruction to respond to a selected stimulus displayed on a screen by pressing the space bar as quickly as possible (Go stimuli) and withholding responses to other stimuli (No-Go stimuli). To develop seven versions of varying difficulty, we manipulated the task context by making changes in stimulus complexity, stimulus presentation time, inter-stimulus intervals and the probability of target occurrence. Results: Decreasing the stimulus presentation time and simultaneously using more complex stimuli caused a significant decrease in true hits on Go trials, which is a good marker for response initiation, while an increase in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to a decrease in commission errors in No-Go trials, which is a good marker of response inhibition. Further analysis revealed that reaction time and age did not influence the GNG task scores while education level and gender may affect scores of Go trials but not No-Go trials. Conclusions: Manipulation in both stimulus complexity and presentation time caused significant changes in response initiation scores, while alteration in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to significant changes in motor inhibition scores. Optimization of GNG tasks to measure response inhibition and initiation could be achieved with psychometric manipulation on various features of stimulus presentation for different target populations.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 366
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Task-irrelevant odours affect both response inhibition and response readiness in fast-paced Go/No-Go task: the case of valence
    Javier Albayay
    Umberto Castiello
    Valentina Parma
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [32] Response inhibition toward alcohol-related cues using an alcohol go/no-go task in problem and non-problem drinkers
    Kreusch, Fanny
    Vilenne, Aurelie
    Quertemont, Etienne
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2013, 38 (10) : 2520 - 2528
  • [33] The feasibility of using the go/no-go task as a dementia screening test assessed with a cross-sectional design
    Watanabe, Noriaki
    Kamijo, Masayoshi
    Nishino, Tomoyuki
    Ashida, Kazuki
    Sasamori, Fumihito
    Okuhara, Masao
    Maruo, Suchinda Jarupat
    Tabuchi, Hisaaki
    Terasawa, Koji
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [34] Reactive Aggression Affects Response Inhibition to Angry Expressions in Adolescents: An Event-Related Potential Study Using the Emotional Go/No-Go Paradigm
    Sun, Lijun
    Li, Junyi
    Niu, Gengfeng
    Zhang, Lei
    Chang, Hongjuan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [35] Automatic Emotion Regulation in Response Inhibition: The Temporal Dynamics of Emotion Counter-Regulation During a Go/No-Go Task
    Zhang, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 558 - 558
  • [36] Automatic emotion regulation in response inhibition: The temporal dynamics of emotion counter-regulation during a go/no-go task
    Zhang, Jing
    Feng, Caixia
    Mai, Xiaoqin
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 53 (12) : 1909 - 1917
  • [37] Response execution and inhibition on a go/No-go task: An event-related potential study of children with fetal alcohol syndrome
    Burden, M. J.
    Andrew, C.
    Saint-Amour, D.
    Meintjes, E. M.
    Molteno, C. D.
    Hoyme, H. E.
    Robinson, L. K.
    Khaole, N.
    Nelson, C. A.
    Jacobson, S. W.
    Jacobson, J. L.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (06) : 137A - 137A
  • [38] Effects of HIV-1 Tat within the Go/No-Go Task using a Transgenic Mouse Model
    Jacobs, I. R.
    Antonucci, A. G.
    Fergusson, A. B.
    Manjarres, M.
    Sabater, S. M.
    Ignatowska-Jankowska, B.
    Fitting, S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNE PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 12 : S58 - S58
  • [39] EFFECTS OF MEDIAL SEPTAL-LESIONS ON AN OPERANT GO NO-GO DELAYED-RESPONSE ALTERNATION TASK IN RATS
    NUMAN, R
    FELONEY, MP
    PHAM, KH
    TIEBER, LM
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1995, 58 (06) : 1263 - 1271
  • [40] Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency
    Nieuwenhuis, Sander
    Yeung, Nick
    van den Wildenberg, Wery
    Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 3 (01) : 17 - 26