EVALUATION OF INHIBITION RESPONSE BEHAVIOR USING THE GO/NO-GO PARADIGM IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS: EFFECTS OF VARIATIONS IN THE TASK DESIGN

被引:7
|
作者
Rezvanfard, Mehrnaz [1 ,2 ]
Golesorkhi, Mehrshad [3 ,4 ]
Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh [3 ]
Safaei, Hooman [1 ]
Eghbali, Aiden Nasiri [2 ]
Alizadeh, Hanieh [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ekhtiari, Hamed [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, INCAS, Neurocognit Lab, Tehran, Iran
[2] Rah E Roshan Addict Treatment Ctr, Karaj, Iran
[3] Inst Cognit Sci Studies, Translat Neurosci Program, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Neuroimaging & Anal Grp, Res Ctr Mol & Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
关键词
No-Go/Go; executive functions; inhibitory control; psychophysics;
D O I
10.5604/17307503.1227530
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Inhibitory control is an important executive function and a deficiency in action inhibition has been characterized as core in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. The Go/No-Go (GNG) paradigm is a wellknown method to evaluate an inhibitory response. We developed seven versions of the GNG to evaluate the effect of different psychometric properties on GNG scores in normal healthy subjects. Material/Methods: Fifty seven healthy subjects including 38 (66.7%) males, aged 18 to 55 (mean +/- SD: 33.7 +/- 8.1) participated in this study. Each subject conducted seven variants of GNG tasks in a randomized order after being given instruction to respond to a selected stimulus displayed on a screen by pressing the space bar as quickly as possible (Go stimuli) and withholding responses to other stimuli (No-Go stimuli). To develop seven versions of varying difficulty, we manipulated the task context by making changes in stimulus complexity, stimulus presentation time, inter-stimulus intervals and the probability of target occurrence. Results: Decreasing the stimulus presentation time and simultaneously using more complex stimuli caused a significant decrease in true hits on Go trials, which is a good marker for response initiation, while an increase in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to a decrease in commission errors in No-Go trials, which is a good marker of response inhibition. Further analysis revealed that reaction time and age did not influence the GNG task scores while education level and gender may affect scores of Go trials but not No-Go trials. Conclusions: Manipulation in both stimulus complexity and presentation time caused significant changes in response initiation scores, while alteration in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to significant changes in motor inhibition scores. Optimization of GNG tasks to measure response inhibition and initiation could be achieved with psychometric manipulation on various features of stimulus presentation for different target populations.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 366
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Negative inhibition is poor in sub-threshold depression individuals: Evidence from ERP and a Go/No-go task
    Zhang, Xin
    Jia, Huibin
    Wang, Enguo
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2023, 331
  • [22] Response inhibition on a Go/No-go task in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis patients: an fMRI study
    Lysenko, M.
    Akbar, N.
    Yeh, E. A.
    Banwell, B.
    Till, C.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 : 131 - 131
  • [23] Go/No-Go Training Changes Food Evaluation in Both Morbidly Obese and Normal-Weight Individuals
    Chen, Zhang
    Veling, Harm
    de Vries, Stijn P.
    Bijvank, Bas Olde
    Janssen, Ignace M. C.
    Dijksterhuis, Ap
    Holland, Rob W.
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 86 (12) : 980 - 990
  • [24] fMRI predictors of treatment response in major depressive disorder using a parametric Go/No-go Task
    Langenecker, S. A.
    Brinkman, M.
    Young, E. A.
    Akil, H.
    Noll, D. C.
    Zubieta, J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 21 (03) : 398 - 398
  • [25] MEG study of occipital lobe function changes according to task demand using a visual Go/No-Go paradigm
    Takei, Y
    Kumano, S
    Hattori, S
    Uehara, T
    Fukuda, M
    Mikuni, M
    UNVEILING THE MYSTERY OF THE BRAIN: NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BRAIN FUNCTION, 2005, 1278 : 173 - 176
  • [26] Strain Differences in Behavioral Inhibition in a Go/No-go Task Demonstrated Using 15 Inbred Mouse Strains
    Gubner, Noah R.
    Wilhelm, Clare J.
    Phillips, Tamara J.
    Mitchell, Suzanne H.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (08) : 1353 - 1362
  • [27] Supplementary motor area in motor response inhibition and preparation: Evidence from an fMRI study of a Go/No-go task
    Mostofsky, SH
    Abrams, MT
    Goldberg, MC
    Schafer, JGB
    Pekar, JJ
    Courtney, SM
    Calhoun, VD
    Kraut, MA
    Denckla, MB
    NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (07) : A321 - A321
  • [28] Do shorter inter-stimulus intervals in the go/no-go task enable better assessment of response inhibition?
    Hasegawa, Akira
    Matsumoto, Noboru
    Yamashita, Yuko
    Tanaka, Keisuke
    Kawaguchi, Jun
    Yamamoto, Tetsuya
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 62 (02) : 118 - 124
  • [29] Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters
    Zhao, Xin
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Zan, Xiangyi
    Jin, Ge
    Maes, Joseph H. R.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [30] Task-irrelevant odours affect both response inhibition and response readiness in fast-paced Go/No-Go task: the case of valence
    Albayay, Javier
    Castiello, Umberto
    Parma, Valentina
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)