EVALUATION OF INHIBITION RESPONSE BEHAVIOR USING THE GO/NO-GO PARADIGM IN NORMAL INDIVIDUALS: EFFECTS OF VARIATIONS IN THE TASK DESIGN

被引:7
|
作者
Rezvanfard, Mehrnaz [1 ,2 ]
Golesorkhi, Mehrshad [3 ,4 ]
Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh [3 ]
Safaei, Hooman [1 ]
Eghbali, Aiden Nasiri [2 ]
Alizadeh, Hanieh [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ekhtiari, Hamed [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, INCAS, Neurocognit Lab, Tehran, Iran
[2] Rah E Roshan Addict Treatment Ctr, Karaj, Iran
[3] Inst Cognit Sci Studies, Translat Neurosci Program, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Neuroimaging & Anal Grp, Res Ctr Mol & Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
关键词
No-Go/Go; executive functions; inhibitory control; psychophysics;
D O I
10.5604/17307503.1227530
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Inhibitory control is an important executive function and a deficiency in action inhibition has been characterized as core in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. The Go/No-Go (GNG) paradigm is a wellknown method to evaluate an inhibitory response. We developed seven versions of the GNG to evaluate the effect of different psychometric properties on GNG scores in normal healthy subjects. Material/Methods: Fifty seven healthy subjects including 38 (66.7%) males, aged 18 to 55 (mean +/- SD: 33.7 +/- 8.1) participated in this study. Each subject conducted seven variants of GNG tasks in a randomized order after being given instruction to respond to a selected stimulus displayed on a screen by pressing the space bar as quickly as possible (Go stimuli) and withholding responses to other stimuli (No-Go stimuli). To develop seven versions of varying difficulty, we manipulated the task context by making changes in stimulus complexity, stimulus presentation time, inter-stimulus intervals and the probability of target occurrence. Results: Decreasing the stimulus presentation time and simultaneously using more complex stimuli caused a significant decrease in true hits on Go trials, which is a good marker for response initiation, while an increase in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to a decrease in commission errors in No-Go trials, which is a good marker of response inhibition. Further analysis revealed that reaction time and age did not influence the GNG task scores while education level and gender may affect scores of Go trials but not No-Go trials. Conclusions: Manipulation in both stimulus complexity and presentation time caused significant changes in response initiation scores, while alteration in the ratio of No-Go/Go trials led to significant changes in motor inhibition scores. Optimization of GNG tasks to measure response inhibition and initiation could be achieved with psychometric manipulation on various features of stimulus presentation for different target populations.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 366
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of a startle stimulus on response speed and inhibition in a go/no-go task
    Washington, Jessica R.
    Blumenthal, Terry D.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 52 (06) : 745 - 753
  • [2] Response inhibition in the parametric Go/No-Go task in psychopathic offenders
    Weidacker, Kathrin
    Snowden, Robert J.
    Boy, Frederic
    Johnston, Stephen J.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 250 : 256 - 263
  • [3] RSA REACTIVITY RELATES TO PERFORMANCE ON A GO/NO-GO BEHAVIOR INHIBITION TASK
    Condy, Emma
    Friedman, Bruce
    Gandjbakhche, Amir
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 : S75 - S75
  • [4] Response Inhibition to Physical Inactivity Stimuli in an Affective Go/No-Go Task
    Cheval, Boris
    Daou, Marcos
    Cabral, Daniel
    Bacelar, Mariane
    Parma, Juliana
    Forestier, Cyril
    Orsholits, Dan
    Sander, David
    Boisgontier, Matthieu
    Miller, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 42 : S71 - S71
  • [5] RESPONSE INHIBITION IN THE GO/NO-GO TASK: COMPARING SIMULATED DAYSHIFT AND NIGHTSHIFT SCHEDULES
    Foy, D. J.
    Jackson, M. L.
    Hinson, J. M.
    Whitney, P.
    Van Dongen, H.
    SLEEP, 2011, 34 : A86 - A86
  • [6] Response Inhibition and Psychopathology: A Meta-Analysis of Go/No-Go Task Performance
    Wright, Leah
    Lipszyc, Jonathan
    Dupuis, Annie
    Thayapararajah, Sathees Waran
    Schachar, Russell
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 123 (02) : 429 - 439
  • [7] The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: Evidence from a go/no-go task
    Los, Sander A.
    COGNITION, 2013, 129 (02) : 328 - 344
  • [8] RELATION OF A NEGATIVE ERP COMPONENT TO RESPONSE-INHIBITION IN A GO/NO-GO TASK
    JODO, E
    KAYAMA, Y
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 82 (06): : 477 - 482
  • [9] Magnetoencephalographic study of frontal lobe function in stimulus processing and response inhibition using Go/No-Go paradigm
    Kumano, S
    Takei, Y
    Hattori, S
    Uehara, T
    Fukuda, M
    Mikuni, M
    UNVEILING THE MYSTERY OF THE BRAIN: NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BRAIN FUNCTION, 2005, 1278 : 235 - 238
  • [10] Effects of task repetition on event-related potentials in somatosensory Go/No-go paradigm
    Nakata, Hiroki
    Sakamoto, Kiwako
    Kakigi, Ryusuke
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2015, 594 : 82 - 86