THE TEST OF ORIENTATION FOR REHABILITATION PATIENTS - TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY

被引:1
作者
DEITZ, JC
TOVAR, VS
BEEMAN, C
THORN, DW
TREVISAN, MS
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON, DEPT REHABIL MED, SEATTLE, WA 98195 USA
[2] UNIV WASHINGTON, HARBORVIEW MED CTR, SEATTLE, WA 98104 USA
[3] COMMUNITY HOME HLTH CARE, SEATTLE, WA USA
[4] RMC RES CORP, PORTLAND, OR USA
来源
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH | 1992年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; BRAIN INJURY;
D O I
10.1177/153944929201200304
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Test of Orientation for Rehabilitation Patients was developed for assessing the orientation of inpatients with brain injuries in rehabilitation settings. The test is composed of 46 items grouped into five domains of orientation: 1) Person and Personal Situation, 2) Place, 3) Time, 4) Schedule, and 5) Temporal Continuity. Test-retest reliability and magnitudes of difference between scores on test and retest were examined using subgroups of 30 rehabilitation patients with brain injuries and 32 rehabilitation patients without brain injuries, The interval between test and retest ranged from 3 to 5 days. Test-retest reliability estimates (using the two-way random effects repeated measures model of the intraclass correlation coefficient) for the total test scores were good (r = .85) to excellent (r = .95) for the non-brain-injury and brain-injury groups, respectively. Reliability coefficients for the domain scores were higher for the brain-injury group than the non-brain-injury group. However when agreements between test and retest scores were examined, the non-brain-injury group showed greater stability.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 185
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of attention measures
    Fernandez-Marcos, Tatiana
    de la Fuente, Cristina
    Santacreu, Jose
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2018, 25 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [22] Test-retest reliability of dynamic causal modeling for fMRI
    Fraessle, Stefan
    Stephan, Klaas Enno
    Friston, Karl John
    Steup, Marlena
    Krach, Soeren
    Paulus, Frieder Michel
    Jansen, Andreas
    NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 117 : 56 - 66
  • [23] Test-retest reliability of regression dynamic causal modeling
    Frassle, Stefan
    Stephan, Klaas E.
    NETWORK NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 6 (01): : 135 - 160
  • [24] Test-Retest Reliability of the Open Card Sorting Method
    Pampoukidou, Styliani
    Katsanos, Christos
    EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2021 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'21), 2021,
  • [25] The Test-Retest Reliability of Fatty Acid Taste Thresholds
    Newman, Lisa P.
    Keast, Russell S. J.
    CHEMOSENSORY PERCEPTION, 2013, 6 (02) : 70 - 77
  • [26] Test-Retest Reliability of the Preroad DriveABLE Competence Screen
    Korner-Bitensky, N.
    Audet, T.
    Man-Son-Hing, M.
    Benoit, D.
    Kaizer, F.
    Gelinas, I.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS, 2011, 29 (03) : 202 - 212
  • [27] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY IN EEG FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS
    SALINSKY, MC
    OKEN, BS
    MOREHEAD, L
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 79 (05): : 382 - 392
  • [28] Test-retest reliability of EEG network characteristics in infants
    van der Velde, Bauke
    Haartsen, Rianne
    Kemner, Chantal
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [29] Test-retest reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN)
    Arvidsson, H
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 57 (04) : 279 - 283
  • [30] Test-retest reliability of the multifocal photopic negative response
    Van Alstine, Anthony W.
    Viswanathan, Suresh
    DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2017, 134 (01) : 25 - 36