Evaluating biological pretreatment as a feasible methodology for ethanol production from paddy straw

被引:46
作者
Arora, Anju [1 ]
Priya, Shweta [1 ]
Sharma, Pankhuri [1 ]
Sharma, Shalley [1 ]
Nain, Lata [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Microbiol, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Paddy straw; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Steam pretreatment; Biological pretreatment; T; hirsuta; S; cerevisiae;
D O I
10.1016/j.bcab.2016.08.006
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bioethanol has been recognized as a promising contemporary fuel. One of the most abundant renewable resources for bioethanol production is paddy straw with high carbohydrate content. A pretreatment step disintegrates the recalcitrant lignocellulosic structure in biomass, which facilitates the access of hydrolytic enzymes to the glucan macrostructure. Biological pretreatment is an eco-friendly alternative to harsh thermo-chemical pretreatment methodologies. In this study, paddy straw (rice variety Pusa 2511) was subjected to biological pretreatment with white-rot fungus, Trametes hirsuta and simultaneously with steam pretreatment at 121 degrees C. Resultant saccharification efficiencies of differentially pretreated paddy straw were compared to evaluate biological pretreatment. After pretreatment cellulose content in steam treated paddy straw was 39.5%, whereas for biological it was 37.6% and respective lignin contents were 14.2% and 4.7%. Lignin removal was substantially higher in biological pretreatment than steam pretreatment. The saccharification yields of biological pretreatment were at par with steam pretreated paddy straw. Highest saccharification efficiency was observed after 24 h, at 2% glucan loading, for both biological (76.5%) and steam pretreatment (74.1%). Maximum production of sugar (52.91 g L-1) was observed in biologically pretreated biomass at 10% glucan loading after 24 h. Fermentation of biomass hydrolysates with Saccharomyces cereyisiae, showed low ethanol production from biologically (0.86 g L-1) as well as steam pretreated biomass (1.13 g L-1) with fermentation efficiency ranging from 26 to 52%, suggesting presence of inhibitory factors necessitating detoxification of hydrolysates. This study, established biological pretreatment as feasible method for pretreatment and higher sugar yields. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 72
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Abdelnur P., 2014, CHEM BIOL TECHNOLOGI, V1, P1
  • [2] Pretreatment of switchgrass by ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX)
    Hasan Alizadeh
    Farzaneh Teymouri
    Thomas I. Gilbert
    Bruce E. Dale
    [J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2005, 124 (1-3) : 1133 - 1141
  • [3] Arora A., 2005, WORLD J MICROBIOL BI
  • [4] Understanding the Pine Dilute Acid Pretreatment System for Enhanced Enzymatic Hydrolysis
    Arora, Anju
    Carrier, Danielle Julie
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2015, 3 (10): : 2423 - 2428
  • [5] Effect of Formic Acid and Furfural on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose Powder and Dilute Acid-Pretreated Poplar Hydrolysates
    Arora, Anju
    Martin, Elizabeth M.
    Pelkki, Matthew H.
    Carrier, Danielle Julie
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2013, 1 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [6] An overview of key pretreatment processes employed for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value added products
    Chaturvedi, Venkatesh
    Verma, Pradeep
    [J]. 3 BIOTECH, 2013, 3 (05) : 415 - 431
  • [7] Dixit G., 2015, BIORESOUR BIOPROCESS, V2, P46
  • [8] The promoting effect of byproducts from Irpex lacteus on subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of bio-pretreated cornstalks
    Du, Wanqing
    Yu, Hongbo
    Song, Lili
    Zhang, Ji
    Weng, Changlong
    Ma, Fuying
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2011, 4
  • [9] FAN LT, 1987, CELLULOSE HYDROLYSIS, P149
  • [10] Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines
    Gadde, Butchaiah
    Bonnet, Sebastien
    Menke, Christoph
    Garivait, Savitri
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2009, 157 (05) : 1554 - 1558