Teachers' views of their assessment practice

被引:12
作者
Atjonen, Paivi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Philosoph Fac, Sch Educ Sci & Psychol, Educ, Joensuu, Finland
关键词
assessment; primary teachers; school teachers; educational equality; formative assessment;
D O I
10.1080/09585176.2013.874952
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The main aim of this research was to analyse teachers' views of pupil assessment. The theoretical framework was based on existing literature on advances and challenges of pupil assessment in regard to support for learning, fairness, educational partnership, feedback, and favourable methods. The data were gathered by means of a questionnaire designed for teachers of comprehensive schools. Teachers were first asked to describe a good (right/fair) and a bad (wrong/unfair) case of pupil assessment selected from the period of latest three years. Second, two lists of factors were presented, and respondents were asked to indicate which were the most influential in making pupil assessment either difficult or easy. One hundred twenty-six teachers completed and returned the questionnaire. A descriptive, mainly qualitative approach was used to analyse the data. The majority of positive views concerned the use of different assessment methods, an interactive approach, encouraging feedback, and criteria clarification. Negative views dealt with improper assessment methods, level of stringency, badly implemented assessment, and weak grounds for assessment. Three factors made assessment as difficult: interpretation of fairness, pupils with special needs, and pupils' heterogeneity. On the other hand, versatile assessment methods, curriculum advice, and pupils' good competencies made teachers' assessment work easy.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 259
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Andrade H., 2007, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V32, P159, DOI [10.1080/02602930600801928, DOI 10.1080/02602930600801928]
[2]  
Athanasiadis I., 2009, REV EUROPEAN STUDIES, V1, P124
[3]  
Atjonen P, 2003, TYO ARVONSA ANSAITSE, P104
[4]   Students, Teachers and Alternative Assessment in Secondary School: Relational Models Theory (RMT) in the Field of Education [J].
Bagley, Sylvia Stralberg .
AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2010, 37 (01) :83-106
[5]   Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom [J].
Black, P ;
Harrison, C ;
Lee, C ;
Marshall, B ;
Wiliam, D .
PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2004, 86 (01) :8-21
[6]  
Black P, 1998, PHI DELTA KAPPAN, V80, P139
[7]  
Black P., 1998, ASSESS EDUC, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102
[8]   Can teachers' summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? [J].
Black, Paul ;
Harrison, Christine ;
Hodgen, Jeremy ;
Marshall, Bethan ;
Serret, Natasha .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (04) :451-469
[9]   Road Maps for Learning: A Guide to the Navigation of Learning Progressions [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wilson, Mark ;
Yao, Shih-Ying .
MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 9 (2-3) :71-123
[10]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]