USERS VIEWS OF MODEL PERFORMANCE AND EXPECTATIONS

被引:0
作者
KINSMAN, P
WILDAY, J
NUSSEY, C
MERCER, A
机构
[1] UNIV SHEFFIELD,DEPT MECH & PROC ENGN,SHEFFIELD S1 4DU,ENGLAND
[2] UK HLTH & SAFETY EXECUT,DIV RES & LAB SERV,SAFETY ENGN LAB,SHEFFIELD S3 7HQ,ENGLAND
关键词
HAZARD RANGES; COMPUTER CODES; ACCIDENT SCENARIOS;
D O I
10.1016/0950-4230(94)80031-6
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A recent detailed investigation of the hazard ranges predicted by a variety of computer codes for several types of accident scenario involving 16 hazardous substances highlighted a variety of problems for the unwary computer code user and revealed deficiencies in the codes themselves. The physical phenomena modelled included outflow from pipes and vessels, pool evaporation and dispersion of dense and passive gases. In all, about 2000 computer runs were made to investigate the sensitivity of output parameters (such as mass flow rate, evaporation rate and concentration) to different inputs. This paper discusses the expectations of computer code users, and attempts to show that code producers would have a better working relationship with their customers if they supplied codes that were more tailored to the customers' needs.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, RISK CRITERIA LAND U
[2]  
BRITTER RE, 1992, CEC EUR14774 REP
[3]   A COMPARISON OF DENSE GAS DISPERSION MODEL SIMULATIONS WITH BURRO SERIES LNG SPILL TEST-RESULTS [J].
ERMAK, DL ;
CHAN, ST ;
MORGAN, DL ;
MORRIS, LK .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1982, 6 (1-2) :129-160
[4]   HAZARDOUS GAS-MODEL EVALUATIONS - IS AN EQUITABLE COMPARISON POSSIBLE [J].
HANNA, SR .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1994, 7 (02) :133-138
[5]  
MCQUAID J, 1984, ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSI
[6]  
MCQUAID J, 1987, J HAZARD MATER, V16
[7]  
MCQUAID J, 1985, J HAZARD MATER, V11
[8]  
MERCER A, IN PRESS J HAZARD MA
[9]  
MERCER A, 1988, 1986 P IMA C STABL S
[10]   RESEARCH TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT FOR MAJOR CHEMICAL HAZARDS [J].
NUSSEY, C .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1994, 7 (02) :175-196