Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations

被引:0
作者
Moradi, Mina [1 ]
Hormozi, Elham [2 ]
Shamohammadi, Milad [3 ]
Rakhshan, Vahid [4 ]
机构
[1] North Khorasan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Bojnurd, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Ahvaz, Iran
[4] Azad Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Anat, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Surface roughness; Composite restoration; Bracket debonding; Surface treatments; Profilometry;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2018.09.017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: To increase bond strength of brackets bonded to composite restorations, underlying composite restorations are usually roughened. This and subsequent bracket debonding might deteriorate smoothness of composite restoration, leading to clinical and aesthetic problems. Since this was not assessed before, this study was conducted. Methods: Seventy intact human premolars were collected and filled with composite restorations. They were randomly divided into 3 groups: control (n = 10), surface treatments before bracket bonding (bur, sandblasting, overall n = 40), and surface roughening without bracket bonding (bur, sandblasting, overall n = 20). The 40 specimens with bracket bonding steps were divided into two subgroups of with and without polishing after debonding of brackets (each n = 10). After aging the composites in two steps and treating surfaces according to abovementioned protocols, their surface topographies were evaluated under stereomicroscopy (80 x), scanning electron microscopy (using Zachrisson-Arthun index, at 500 x and 1000 x zooms), and by profilometry. Profilometry parameters and Zachrisson-Arthun index were statistically compared among different groups (alpha = 0.05, 0.005). Results: According to Kruskal-Wallis test, all profilometry parameters or the Zachrisson and Arthun index were significantly different between groups involving bracket debonding and control (P <= 0.001). Three-way ANOVA indicated that bracket debonding, polishing after debonding, and surface treatments before bracket bonding had a significant effect on Ra and Rz (P <= 0.05). Tukey post hoc test showed that bur and sandblasting methods were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Bur-roughening or sandblasting of composite surface before bonding brackets can increase surface roughness, while polishing can reduce it back to control levels. (C) 2018 CEO. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 637
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF FLOOR IN GROOVE MICRO MILLING
    Kouravand, S.
    Imani, B. M.
    Ni, J.
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS, 2014, 30 (06) : 667 - 678
  • [22] Effects of whitening toothpastes on the esthetic properties and surface roughness of a composite resin
    Yilmaz, Merve N.
    Gul, Pinar
    Unal, Mehmet
    Turgut, Guven
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2021, 63 (04) : 320 - 325
  • [23] Comparing the effect of two polishing systems on surface roughness of feldspathic, lithium disilicate, and translucent zirconia ceramics after orthodontic bracket debonding: An in vitro study
    Fahimi, Mohammad Amin
    Azarbayejani, Saeed
    Mohammadi-Bassir, Mahshid
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 22 (04)
  • [24] Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding
    Verdonschot, N
    Tanck, E
    Huiskes, R
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1998, 42 (04): : 554 - 559
  • [25] Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Ceramic and Resin Composite Material Used for Conservative Indirect Restorations, after Repolishing by Intraoral Means
    Vrochari, Areti D.
    Petropoulou, Aikaterini
    Chronopoulos, Vasilios
    Polydorou, Olga
    Massey, Ward
    Hellwig, Elmar
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (04): : 296 - 301
  • [26] Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
    Rebecca Jungbauer
    Anja Liebermann
    Christian M. Hammer
    Daniel Edelhoff
    Peter Proff
    Bogna Stawarczyk
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 4389 - 4399
  • [27] Impact of polishing system on surface roughness of different ceramic surfaces after various pretreatments and bracket debonding
    Jungbauer, Rebecca
    Liebermann, Anja
    Hammer, Christian M. M.
    Edelhoff, Daniel
    Proff, Peter
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (08) : 4389 - 4399
  • [28] Correlation Between Frictional Force and Surface Roughness of Orthodontic Archwires
    Choi, Samjin
    Hwang, Eun-Young
    Park, Hun-Kuk
    Park, Young-Guk
    SCANNING, 2015, 37 (06) : 399 - 405
  • [29] Evaluation of Enamel Roughness in Vitro After Orthodontic Bracket Debonding Using Different Methods of Residual Adhesive Removal
    Lima Ferreira, Jose Tarcisio
    Borsatto, Maria Cristina
    Pereira Saraiva, Maria Conceicao
    Nakane Matsumoto, Mirian Aiko
    Torres, Carolina Paes
    Romano, Fabio Lourenco
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [30] The Influence of Different Cleaning Protocols on the Surface Roughness of Orthodontic Retainers
    Simunovic, Luka
    Blagec, Tadeja
    Mestrovic, Senka
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):