Participatory Apps for Urban Planning-Space for Improvement

被引:104
作者
Ertio, Titiana-Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Social Res, Econ Sociol, Turku, Finland
关键词
citizen participation; smartphone applications; mobile participation; urban planning;
D O I
10.1080/02697459.2015.1052942
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Participatory urban planning is considered an important aspect of developing local democracy. Recently, the use of mobile technologies to engage with citizens has gained interest among researchers, policy-makers, and activists. The purpose of this article is to introduce a typology that identifies types of mobile applications (apps) supporting citizen participation in urban planning. The presented typology is developed based on theories of participation and has three dimensions: type of data collected, information flow, and empowerment of citizens. Overall, the typology identifies eight types of participatory apps. Participatory apps in use around the world are then plotted into the typology and their contribution is analyzed with reference to the dimensions of the typology. Apps evolve from sharing information on the surrounding environment towards a dialogue aimed to accommodate citizen knowledge into the planning process. The article concludes that the impact of planning apps has yet been modest, but is expected to increase, and discusses ways in which planning apps can leverage citizens' knowledge in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 321
页数:19
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Volunteered Geographic Information: Potential Implications for Participatory Planning [J].
Adams, David .
PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2013, 28 (04) :464-469
[2]  
Albergotti R, 2014, WALL STREET J
[3]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[4]   Apple Pie-Spinach Metaphor: Shall e-Democracy make Participatory Planning More Wholesome? [J].
Astrom, Joachim ;
Granberg, Mikael ;
Khakee, Abdul .
PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (05) :571-586
[5]   Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice - the case of Finland [J].
Backlund, Pia ;
Mantysalo, Raine .
PLANNING THEORY, 2010, 9 (04) :333-350
[6]   Achieving Successful Participation in the New UK Spatial Planning System [J].
Baker, Mark ;
Coaffee, Jon ;
Sherriff, Graeme .
PLANNING PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2007, 22 (01) :79-93
[7]   Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings [J].
Baker, WH ;
Addams, HL ;
Davis, B .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2005, 65 (04) :490-499
[8]   The myths of E-government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government [J].
Bekkers, Victor ;
Homburg, Vincent .
INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2007, 23 (05) :373-382
[9]   The Diversity of Public Participation Tools: Complementing or Competing With One Another? [J].
Bherer, Laurence ;
Breux, Sandra .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2012, 45 (02) :379-403
[10]   Comment [J].
Booher, David E. ;
Innes, Judith .
PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2005, 6 (03) :431-435