ABORTION IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES: APPROACHES AND CHALLENGES

被引:0
作者
Estrada Tanck, Dorothy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Derecho Int Publ & Relac Int, Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Tlaxcala, Fac Derecho, Proyecto Derechos Humanos & Justicia Int, Tlaxcala, Mexico
来源
CIENCIA JURIDICA | 2018年 / 7卷 / 13期
关键词
Abortion; international law; comparative perspective; human rights; women's rights;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article will map and analyze the main trends that public international law, comparative law and transnational perspectives have followed when approaching the issue of abortion. It will examine the way in which the legal argumentation and interpretation is constructed, the approximations and criteria legal scholars, legislators and courts have adopted in selecting the points of comparison, as well as the varied subjects, rights and social values that enter under scrutiny when coping with this matter. It will do so under the main referential framework of international human rights law and doctrine, as an approach through which academic outlooks, legislative positions and practical instances regarding abortion can be studied, considering the universal values and objectives which serve as the foundation of such rights.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 25
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Amnesty International, ED SEX DER HUM
[2]  
Amnesty International, 2009, 430012009 AMR AMN IN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SUPR CORT JUST DER V
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, LAB NELL SENT CORT C
[5]  
COOK Rebecca, 2016, ABORTO DERECHO TRANS
[6]  
Cook RJ, 2014, PA STUD HUM RIGHTS, P1
[7]   Human rights and abortion laws [J].
Cook, RJ ;
Dickens, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1999, 65 (01) :81-87
[8]  
Davis Martha F., 2009, 332009 NE U SCH LAW
[9]  
Dorsen Norman, 2003, AM CASEBOOK SERIES, P526
[10]  
Erdman JN, 2009, CONSTITUTING EQUALITY: GENDER EQUALITY AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, P107, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596780.007