REASONS FOR WOMENS NON-UPTAKE OF AMNIOCENTESIS

被引:42
作者
JULIANREYNIER, C
MACQUARTMOULIN, G
MOATTI, JP
AURRAN, Y
CHABAL, F
AYME, S
机构
[1] HOP ENFANTS LA TIMONE,CTR GENET,INSERM,RES UNIT 242,F-13385 MARSEILLE 5,FRANCE
[2] INST J PAOLI I CALMETTES,INSERM,RES UNIT U379,F-13009 MARSEILLE,FRANCE
[3] INSERM,SC11,F-94807 VILLEJUIF,FRANCE
关键词
AMNIOCENTESIS; MATERNAL AGE; SOCIAL PREFERENCES; INEQUITIES IN HEALTH CARE;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1970140915
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
More than 10 years after a chromosomal anomaly screening programme was set up in France for pregnant women of advanced age, amniocentesis is still a controversial issue. The reasons why eligible women did not utilize the test and whether or not the existence of social welfare coverage determined women's access to prenatal diagnosis were studied. A group of 291 women aged greater than or equal to 35 years who recently gave birth to normal liveborns was interviewed by telephone. Among those aged 38 years and over, who automatically qualified for social security coverage, 75 per cent had undergone amniocentesis as opposed to 23 per cent in the 35 to 37-year-old non-covered age group who did not qualify for social security coverage. In both groups, access to amniocentesis was found to depend on the physicians', women's and male partners' attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and abortion. Among the younger group, the uptake depended mainly on socio-economic factors. Institutional policies should ensure greater equality of access while allowing for individual preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 864
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ADLER B, 1982, PEDIATRICS, V69, P94
  • [2] AYME S, 1994, NEW HORIZONS NEONATA, P349
  • [3] AYME S, 1992, RECHERCHE POLITIQUES, P219
  • [4] TEMPORAL CHANGES IN THE UTILIZATION OF AMNIOCENTESIS FOR PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS BY WOMEN OF ADVANCED MATERNAL AGE, 1976-1983
    BAIRD, PA
    SADOVNICK, AD
    MCGILLIVRAY, BC
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1985, 5 (03) : 191 - 198
  • [5] THE INFLUENCE OF OBSTETRICIANS ON THE UTILIZATION OF AMNIOCENTESIS
    BERNHARDT, BA
    BANNERMAN, RM
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1982, 2 (02) : 115 - 121
  • [6] BRIARD ML, 1992, EVALUATION INNOVATIO, P171
  • [7] BRINGING SOCIAL-STRUCTURE BACK INTO CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING
    CLARK, JA
    POTTER, DA
    MCKINLAY, JB
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1991, 32 (08) : 853 - 866
  • [8] WHAT COUNTS AS SUCCESS IN GENETIC-COUNSELING - RESPONSE
    CLARKE, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 1993, 19 (01) : 47 - 49
  • [9] DAVIES BL, 1982, NURS RES, V31, P88
  • [10] FACTORS INFLUENCING MATERNAL ESTIMATES OF GENETIC RISK
    EKWO, EE
    SEALS, BF
    KIM, JO
    WILLIAMSON, RA
    HANSON, JW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1985, 20 (03): : 491 - 504