If You Show Me Yours: Reading all "Difference" as "Colonial Difference" in Comparative Philosophy

Postcolonial studies and decolonial theory make visible the nature and extent of Eurocentrism through a critique of constructed categories as basic as "history" and "culture." Walter Mignolo asserts a strong claim that the concept of "culture" is itself a colonial construction, and hence all cultural difference bears the mark of coloniality. This thesis presents a challenge to the field of comparative philosophy: What does "cross-cultural" philosophy even mean if all so-called cultural difference is indeed colonial difference? Could comparativists, in the wake of this critique, preserve the possibility of cross-cultural philosophical inquiry even when basic terms of discourse (such as "culture") are suspended? This essay is a thought experiment in accepting Mignolo's general premise that all cultural difference is colonial difference, through which I offer three strategies for philosophizing comparatively under this constraint: (1) historical contextualization, (2) subversive categorization, and (3) decentralization.