Multi-Criteria Evaluation of End-of-Life Vehicles' Dismantling Scenarios with Respect to Technical Performance and Sustainability Issues

被引：13

作者：

Schmid, Alexis ^{[1
]}

Batton-Hubert, Mireille ^{[2
]}

Naquin, Pascale ^{[3
]}

Gourdon, Remy ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Soc GAIA Conseils, F-69650 Quincieux, France

[2] CNRS, LIMOS, Mines St Etienne, UMR 6158, 158 Cours Fauriel, F-42023 St Etienne, France

[3] INSAVALOR, Div PROVADEMSE, F-69603 Villeurbanne, France

[4] Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, DEEP, 20 Ave A Einstein, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France

来源：

RESOURCES-BASEL | 2016年 / 5卷 / 04期

关键词：

end-of-life vehicles (ELVs); dismantling; shredding; reuse; recovery; recycling; multi-criteria analysis; sustainability;

D O I：

10.3390/resources5040042

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Three scenarios of dismantling and shredding operations of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) were compared in this study with respect to technical and sustainability criteria, according to the level of dismantling applied to the vehicles. The scenarios differed from each other in the extent of the dismantling operations. They were implemented experimentally at the industrial scale on representative samples of 120 vehicles. The data collected from the monitoring of the experimental campaigns were used as feed data for the multi-criteria analysis of the scenarios using the PROMETHEE method. Nine criteria of evaluation were selected, namely global warming, local environmental impacts, tropospheric ozone production, ecotoxicity, operational costs, investment costs, occupational risks, employability, and technical performance. The medium-level dismantling scenario was identified as the best scenario with respect to the criteria of evaluation. This scenario included the steps of depollution, followed by the removal of easily accessible and identifiable plastics and glasses. Reasonable changes in the ponderation of the evaluation criteria did not significantly affect the ranking.

引用

页数：15

共 37 条

[1]

Lecointre E., Filmon K., Observatoire de la filière Véhicules Hors D'usage-Année 2013

[2]

Technical Report of Contract, (2015)

[3]

Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles, Directive 2000/53/EC

[4]

European Commission, (2000)

[5]

Fonseca A.S., Nunes M.I., Matos M.A., Gomes A.P., Environmental impacts of end-of-life vehicles' management: Recovery versus elimination, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess, 18, pp. 1374-1385, (2013)

[6]

Ahmed S., Ahmed S., Shumon M.R.H., Quader E.F.M.A., A comparative decision-making model for sustainable end-of-life vehicle management alternative selection using AHP and extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol, 23, pp. 83-97, (2015)

[7]

Schmid A., Valorisation des Véhicules Hors D'usage (VHU): Comparaison Multicritère de Scénarios de Démantèlement par une étude Expérimentale Menée sur un Site Industriel de Déconstruction/Broyage, (2012)

[8]

Schmid A., Naquin P., Gourdon R., Etude expérimentale de l'incidence du niveau de démantèlement sur le taux de valorisation avant broyage des véhicules hors d'usage (VHU), Déchets Sci. Tech, 61, pp. 30-48, (2012)

[9]

Schmid A., Naquin P., Gourdon R., Incidence of the level of deconstruction of end-of-life vehicles on the rate of material recovery: An industrial-scale experimental study, Resour. Conserv. Recycl, 72, pp. 118-126, (2013)

[10]

Mergias K., Moustakas A., Papadopoulos M., Loizidou Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: The case of Cyprus, J. Hazard. Mater, 147, pp. 706-717, (2007)

← 1 2 3 4 →