Critical Success Factors for Performance Improvement Programs

被引:19
作者
Barron, William M. [1 ]
Krsek, Cathleen [2 ]
Weber, Diane [3 ]
Cerese, Julie [4 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Hlth Syst, Qual & Patient Safety, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[2] Univ HealthSyst Consortium, Nursing Leadership, Oak Brook, IL USA
[3] Univ HealthSyst Consortium, Knowledge Management Serv, Oak Brook, IL USA
[4] Univ HealthSyst Consortium, Clin Proc Improvement, Oak Brook, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1553-7250(05)31028-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Most health care organizations struggle with the design and implementation of effective, systemwide improvement programs. In 2000, the University HealthSystem Consortium initiated a benchmarking project to identify the organizational elements that predict a successful performance improvement (PI) program and that are best suited to support change initiatives. Methods: Forty-one organizations completed a survey about the presence of critical components, processes used to improve performance, and organizational PI structures. Follow-up site visits were conducted at three organizations. Critical Success Factors for a PI Program: Eight organizational success factors for an effective performance improvement program were identified: (1) Strong Administrative Executive and Performance Improvement Leadership, (2) Active Involvement of the Board of Trustees, (3) Effective Oversight Structure, (4) Expert Performance Improvement Staff, (5) Physician Involvement and Accountability, (6) Active Staff Involvement, (7) Effective Use of Information Resources-Data Used for Decision Making, and (8) Effective Communication Strategy. Discussion: The approach offered is grounded in the belief that effective organizational structures and processes are prerequisites to improving health care delivery. Although some empirical support for the proposed model is provided, additional research will be required to determine the effectiveness of this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 226
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors [J].
Bates, DW ;
Leape, LL ;
Cullen, DJ ;
Laird, N ;
Petersen, LA ;
Teich, JM ;
Burdick, E ;
Hickey, M ;
Kleefield, S ;
Shea, B ;
Vander Vliet, M ;
Seger, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (15) :1311-1316
[2]   Improving the quality of health care: Who will lead? [J].
Becher, EC ;
Chassin, MR .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (05) :164-179
[3]   Physicians as leaders in improving health care:: A new series in Annals of Internal Medicine [J].
Berwick, DM ;
Nolan, TW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (04) :289-292
[4]   A primer on leading the improvement of systems [J].
Berwick, DM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7031) :619-622
[5]   A report card on continuous quality improvement [J].
Blumenthal, D ;
Kilo, CM .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1998, 76 (04) :625-+
[6]  
BLUMENTHAL D, 1995, IMPROVING CLIN PRACT
[7]  
Breiman L., 1984, CLASSIFICATION REGRE, P368, DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[8]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QUAL IN
[9]   Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: A framework for change [J].
Ferlie, EB ;
Shortell, SM .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2001, 79 (02) :281-+
[10]   Large employers' new strategies in health care [J].
Galvin, R ;
Milstein, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (12) :939-942