A Quantitative Signature of Self-Control Repair: Rate-Dependent Effects of Successful Addiction Treatment

被引:24
作者
Bickel, Warren K. [1 ]
Landes, Reid D. [2 ]
Kurth-Nelson, Zeb [3 ]
Redish, A. David [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech Caril Res Inst, Addict Recovery Res Ctr, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[3] UCL, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, Inst Neurol, London, England
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurosci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
self-control; addiction; rate dependent; temporal discounting; neurobehavioral; biomarker;
D O I
10.1177/2167702614528162
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Excessive temporal discounting undergirds addiction, and the quantitative relationships of changes in discounting have yet to be investigated. The quantitative relationship between pre-and posttreatment discount rates was examined using data from five of our studies with diverse interventions across different groups of substance users. Discounting and treatment-outcome drug-use data from 222 drug-dependent individuals were analyzed. The primary measures were discounting of delayed reinforcers and objective measures of drug use. Results revealed that change in discounting was inversely related to baseline rates of discounting, such that participants with low discount rates showed little change in discounting with treatment, whereas participants with high discount rates showed large reductions in discounting. As importantly, those treatments that produced the largest gains in drug abstinence had the largest effects on discount rates. Temporal discounting changes with the specific quantitative signature of rate dependence, and more efficacious treatments remediate high discounting rates.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 695
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[31]   A comparison of two algorithms in computerized temporal discounting procedures [J].
Kowal, Benjamin P. ;
Yi, Richard ;
Erisman, Amanda C. ;
Bickel, Warren K. .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2007, 75 (02) :231-236
[32]   Discounting of Hypothetical and Potentially Real Outcomes in Nicotine-Dependent and Nondependent Samples [J].
Lawyer, Steven R. ;
Schoepflin, Frederick ;
Green, Ryan ;
Jenks, Charles .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 19 (04) :263-274
[33]   INTEGRATING BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AND BEHAVIORAL GENETICS: DELAYED REWARD DISCOUNTING AS AN ENDOPHENOTYPE FOR ADDICTIVE DISORDERS [J].
MacKillop, James .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2013, 99 (01) :14-31
[34]   Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis [J].
MacKillop, James ;
Amlung, Michael T. ;
Few, Lauren R. ;
Ray, Lara A. ;
Sweet, Lawrence H. ;
Munafo, Marcus R. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 216 (03) :305-321
[35]   Delayed reward discounting predicts treatment response for heavy drinkers receiving smoking cessation treatment [J].
MacKillop, James ;
Kahler, Christopher W. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2009, 104 (03) :197-203
[36]   Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons [J].
Madden, GJ ;
Raiff, BR ;
Lagorio, CH ;
Begotka, AM ;
Mueller, AM ;
Hehli, DJ ;
Wegener, AA .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 12 (04) :251-261
[37]   Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards [J].
Madden, GJ ;
Begotka, AM ;
Raiff, BR ;
Kastern, LL .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 11 (02) :139-145
[38]  
Mazur J.E., 1987, QUANTITATIVE ANAL BE, P55, DOI DOI 10.1039/c4qo00187g
[39]  
Murphy J. G., 2011, TREATING SUBSTANCE A, P48
[40]   Delay discounting: Trait variable? [J].
Odum, Amy L. .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2011, 87 (01) :1-9