A Quantitative Signature of Self-Control Repair: Rate-Dependent Effects of Successful Addiction Treatment

被引:24
作者
Bickel, Warren K. [1 ]
Landes, Reid D. [2 ]
Kurth-Nelson, Zeb [3 ]
Redish, A. David [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech Caril Res Inst, Addict Recovery Res Ctr, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[3] UCL, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, Inst Neurol, London, England
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurosci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
self-control; addiction; rate dependent; temporal discounting; neurobehavioral; biomarker;
D O I
10.1177/2167702614528162
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Excessive temporal discounting undergirds addiction, and the quantitative relationships of changes in discounting have yet to be investigated. The quantitative relationship between pre-and posttreatment discount rates was examined using data from five of our studies with diverse interventions across different groups of substance users. Discounting and treatment-outcome drug-use data from 222 drug-dependent individuals were analyzed. The primary measures were discounting of delayed reinforcers and objective measures of drug use. Results revealed that change in discounting was inversely related to baseline rates of discounting, such that participants with low discount rates showed little change in discounting with treatment, whereas participants with high discount rates showed large reductions in discounting. As importantly, those treatments that produced the largest gains in drug abstinence had the largest effects on discount rates. Temporal discounting changes with the specific quantitative signature of rate dependence, and more efficacious treatments remediate high discounting rates.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 695
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2010, CANC FACTS FIG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MIND BRAIN WE MAKE D
[3]   Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking? [J].
Audrain-McGovern, Janet ;
Rodriguez, Daniel ;
Epstein, Leonard H. ;
Cuevas, Jocelyn ;
Rodgers, Kelli ;
Wileyto, E. Paul .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2009, 103 (03) :99-106
[4]  
Barkley RA, 1997, ADHD NATURE SELF CON
[5]   Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective [J].
Bechara, A .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (11) :1458-1463
[6]   A Controlled Trial of Working Memory Training for Children and Adolescents with ADHD [J].
Beck, Steven J. ;
Hanson, Christine A. ;
Puffenberger, Synthia S. ;
Benninger, Kristen L. ;
Benninger, William B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 39 (06) :825-836
[7]   Cigarette smokers discount past and future rewards symmetrically and more than controls: Is discounting a measure of impulsivity? [J].
Bickel, Warren K. ;
Yi, Richard ;
Kowal, Benjamin R. ;
Gatchalian, Kirstin M. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2008, 96 (03) :256-262
[8]   Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes [J].
Bickel, Warren K. ;
Miller, Michelle L. ;
Yi, Richard ;
Kowal, Benjamin P. ;
Lindquist, Diana M. ;
Pitcock, Jeffery A. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2007, 90 :S85-S91
[9]   The behavioral- and neuro-economic process of temporal discounting: A candidate behavioral marker of addiction [J].
Bickel, Warren K. ;
Koffarnus, Mikhail N. ;
Moody, Lara ;
Wilson, A. George .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 76 :518-527
[10]   Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction [J].
Bickel, Warren K. ;
Jarmolowicz, David P. ;
Mueller, E. Terry ;
Gatchalian, Kirstin M. ;
McClure, Samuel M. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 221 (03) :361-387