LONG-TERM RESULTS OF PACEMAKER THERAPY AFTER ORTHOTOPIC HEART-TRANSPLANTATION

The objectives of this study were to identify: (1) the indications for pacemaker implantation; (2) the long-term survival; (3) the percentage of bradyarrhythmias below 50 beats/min persisting for more than 3 months; and (4) the variables predicting persistent bradyarrhythmias following orthotopic heart transplantations. During the recent decade (August 1, 1981 through December 31, 1991), 237 patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution. Twenty-six recipients (11%) showed evidence of a symptomatic bradyarrhythmia due to sinus node dysfunction (n = 25) or complete heart block (n = 1), which required insertion of a permanent pacing device. During a mean follow-up period of 17.2 months (range 3 to 57 months), five patients (19%) died and one was lost to follow-up. Actuarial survival at 1 and 4 years were 81% and 65%, respectively, as compared to 79% and 69%, respectively, in patients without permanent pacemakers. Holter monitoring after 3 months (n = 25) and 1 year (n = 14) showed a spontaneous heart rate below 50 beats/min in six (24%) and three patients (18%), respectively. None of the tested variables predicted the necessity of initial pacemaker implantation. However, in patients requiring permanent pacing for a period longer than 3 months, ischemic time of the donor heart was found to be significantly longer as compared to the other patients (221 +/- 76 min vs 137 +/- 91 min, p < 0.05). Conclusions: (1) dysfunction of the donor sinus node is the predominant indication for permanent pacing following orthotopic heart transplantation; (2) pacemaker implantation does not affect long-term survival; (3) after 3 months, permanent pacing appears to be unnecessary in most patients; and (4) a long ischemic time may contribute to the development of persistent bradyarrhythmias following heart transplantation.