ROOT-CANAL INSTRUMENTS ARE POORLY STANDARDIZED

被引:24
|
作者
STENMAN, E
SPANGBERG, LSW
机构
[1] UNIV CONNECTICUT,CTR HLTH,SCH DENT MED,DEPT RESTORAT DENT & ENDODONTOL,263 FARMINGTON AVE,FARMINGTON,CT 06032
[2] UMEA UNIV,FAC ODONTOL,DEPT ORAL DIAG,S-90187 UMEA,SWEDEN
[3] UMEA UNIV,FAC ODONTOL,DEPT DENT MAT & TECHNOL,S-90187 UMEA,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81358-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In an earlier study we demonstrated that root canal instruments vary greatly in their effectiveness in removing substrates. To further analyze the reason for this variation of results, the dimensions of the instruments used were considered of interest as their matching effectiveness may be size dependent. Nine different brands of Hedstrom files, seven brands of K files, and four brands of special files were examined. The measurements were done in a computerized measuring microscope and the data were compared with earlier reported data on machining. Although the dimensions of the instruments varied greatly, no correlation could be found between the machining and dimensions. Only one brand of files was completely within allowable size range.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条