Contributions of social science to agent-based models of building evacuation

被引:36
作者
Aguirre, B. E. [1 ,2 ]
El-Tawil, Sherif [3 ]
Best, Eric [2 ]
Gill, Kimberly B. [1 ,2 ]
Fedorov, Vladimir [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Sociol & Criminal Justice, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Disaster Res Ctr, Core Fac, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/21582041.2011.609380
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper describes the general characteristics of the agent-based models (ABM) approach to the simulation of building evacuations, and offers details of some popular computer codes for building evacuation. Contemporary ABM computer programming emphasising the characteristics of individuals and their propensities to act should be supplemented with codes informed by group-level dimensions such as norms, values, commitments to lines of action, leadership, and a sense of identification and membership in meaningful groups. The paper discusses social science considerations that need to be borne in mind when developing an ABM simulation of building evacuation in a disaster. It includes information on an ABM simulation of a disastrous incident: the fire in a US nightclub in Rhode Island in 2003. The model incorporates aspects of the physical environment in which the evacuation took place, the nature and spread of the fire and the smoke, information on individual and groups in the fire, and the impact of the density of human collectivities on the ability of individual and groups to evacuate. It concludes with seven suggestions for computer programmers developing ABM of human behaviour in building evacuation.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 432
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Normative Collective Behavior in The Station Building Fire [J].
Aguirre, B. E. ;
Torres, Manuel R. ;
Gill, Kimberly B. ;
Hotchkiss, H. Lawrence .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2011, 92 (01) :100-118
[2]  
Aguirre B. E, 2006, HDB 21 CENTURY SOCIO
[3]   METHODOLOGICAL, IDEOLOGICAL, AND CONCEPTUAL-THEORETICAL CRITICISMS OF THE FIELD OF COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDY [J].
AGUIRRE, BE ;
QUARANTELLI, EL .
SOCIOLOGICAL FOCUS, 1983, 16 (03) :195-216
[4]  
Chertkoff J. M., 1999, DONT PANIC PSYCHOL E
[5]   Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors [J].
Drury, John ;
Cocking, Chris ;
Reicher, Steve .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 48 (03) :487-506
[6]  
Dynes R. R., 1968, ORG COMMUNICATIONS D
[7]  
Dynes RussellR., 1970, ORG BEHAV DISASTER
[8]  
Epstein J.M., 1996, GROWING ARTIFICIAL S
[9]  
Fahy R. N., 2008, NRCC51384 I RES CONS
[10]  
Feinberg W. E., 2001, 2 INT S LOND UK INT