Popular constitutionalism: models and criticism

被引：5
作者：
Vieira, Jose Ribas [1 ]
Balmant Emerique, Lilian Marcia [2 ,3 ]
Barreira, Jonatas Henriques [4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Fac Nacl Direito, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Direito, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源：
REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH | 2018年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词：
popular constitutionalism; American constitutionalism; judicial review; judicial supremacy; democracy;
D O I：
10.5380/rinc.v5i3.55478
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
The article brings up the popular constitutionalism, discussing its main authors. Following, it analyses the existing models idealized to materialize this popular constitutionalism. Then, the article points the main critics to this tendency of the American constitutional thought. Departing from all these expositions, the article aims, through a critical bibliographic review of the best contributions of the popular constitutionalism, to find a possibility of reconciliation between judicial supremacy and popular engagement and identify the best contributions made by the popular constitutionalism.
引用
收藏
页码：277 / 302
页数：26
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Alterio Ana Micaela, 2014, Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho, P227
  • [2] BANCROFT George, 1882, HIST CONSTITUTION US
  • [3] BEARD Charles A, 1965, SUPREMA CORTE CONSTI
  • [4] Bickel A., 1986, LEAST DANGEROUS BRAN
  • [5] Chemerinsky E, 2004, U ILLINOIS LAW REV, P673
  • [6] FRIEDMAN Barry, 2004, MICHIGAN LAW REV ANN, V101, P2595
  • [7] JACOME Jorge Gonzalez, 2011, CONSTITUCIONALISMO P
  • [8] KNOWLES Helen J., 2014, SO U LA REV BAT 0409
  • [9] KRAMER Larry, 2009, LIMITES CONTROLE CON
  • [10] KRAMER LARRY D., 2004, PEOPLE THEMSELVES
123