EFFECT OF AGE AND ASTIGMATISM ON THE AMO ARRAY MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS

被引:35
|
作者
JACOBI, PC
KONEN, W
机构
来源
关键词
AGE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEGRADATION OF IMAGE; GLARE; MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS; PSEUDOACCOMMODATION;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80217-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) have been designed to provide better uncorrected near visual acuity than monofocal IOLs, However, the increase in depth of focus is combined with a significant decrease in contrast sensitivity and glare. We implanted a new zonal-progressive MIOL (AMO Array) in 31 eyes of 25 patients whose mean age was 60.8 +/- 13.5 years. At 12.1 +/- 2.4 months postoperatively, the uncorrected visual acuity averaged 0.56 +/- 0.09 (20/32) for distance and 0.54 +/- 0.12 (20/40) for near focus, Seventy-five percent of patients achieved a best corrected distance visual acuity of greater than or equal to 0.9 (20/22). With distance correction only, mean near visual acuity was 0.72 +/- 0.17 (20/25). Best corrected near acuity reached 0.89 +/- 0.11 (20/22), requiring an additional near add of +1.0 to +2.0 diopters (D). We observed an age-dependent difference in the depth of focus. In younger patients (46 +/- 6 years), the pseudoaccommodation range was 6.25 D; acuity attained was greater than or equal to 0.4 (20/50). In older patients (71 +/- 7 years), visual acuity at the near focus was substantially reduced (two lines). Regan contrast sensitivity was lower for MIOL patients at all contrast levels, but the difference was statistically significant only at very low contrast (11%), Contrast sensitivity and glare were dependent on the patient's age but did not change with the amount of postoperative astigmatism, Younger patients were very satisfied with the results of MIOL implantation, and the small loss of contrast sensitivity was counterbalanced by the advantage of improved depth of focus and uncorrected near visual acuity.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 561
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The AMO array foldable silicone multifocal intraocular lens
    Fine, IH
    Hoffman, RS
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINICS, 2000, 40 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [2] Piggyback implantation using the AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens
    Donoso, R
    Rodríguez, A
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (09): : 1506 - 1510
  • [3] Quality of vision after AMO array multifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Sen, HN
    Sarikkola, AU
    Uusitalo, RJ
    Laatikainen, L
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (12): : 2483 - 2493
  • [4] NEW MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS DESIGN
    HANSEN, TE
    CORYDON, L
    KRAG, S
    THIM, K
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (01): : 38 - 41
  • [5] INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS FOR MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    HOLLADAY, JT
    HOFFER, KJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 114 (04) : 405 - 408
  • [6] EFFECT OF SMALL INCISION INTRAOCULAR-LENS SURGERY ON POSTOPERATIVE INFLAMMATION AND ASTIGMATISM - A STUDY OF THE AMO SI-18NB SMALL INCISION LENS
    MARTIN, RG
    SANDERS, DR
    VANDERKARR, MA
    DELUCA, M
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 18 (01): : 51 - 57
  • [8] A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens
    Steinert, RF
    Aker, BL
    Trentacost, DJ
    Smith, PJ
    Tarantino, N
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (07) : 1243 - 1255
  • [9] Pupil size influence on the intraocular performance of the multifocal AMO-Array intraocular lens in elderly patients
    Salati, C.
    Salvetat, M. L.
    Zeppieri, M.
    Brusini, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) : 571 - 578
  • [10] DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS IMAGE QUALITY
    SIMPSON, MJ
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1992, 31 (19) : 3621 - 3626