JUDICIAL REVIEW OF NON-STATUTORY EXECUTIVE ACTION: AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM REUNITED?

被引:0
作者
Sapienza, Amanda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Law Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW | 2018年 / 43卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Unlike that of the United Kingdom, the Australian law on judicial review of exercises of non-statutory executive power is undeveloped. This article proposes a constitutional basis for judicial review of such power in Australia. It then argues that, despite their constitutional differences, there remain principles of common law constitutionalism that are applicable in both the United Kingdom and Australia that can provide guidance to Australian courts and lawyers as to the content of limitations on non-statutory executive action.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 102
页数:36
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LQR, V108, P626
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, LAW Q REV, V123, P225
[3]  
Aronson M, 2014, MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN AUSTRALIA: CONCEPTS AND CONTEXT, P248
[4]  
Aronson Mark, 2017, JUDICIAL REV ADM ACT, P122
[5]  
Billings P, 2014, MODERN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN AUSTRALIA: CONCEPTS AND CONTEXT, P180
[6]  
Blackstone William, 1765, COMMENTARIES LAWS EN, P232
[7]  
Boughey Janina, 2015, FEDERAL LAW REV, V43, P59
[8]  
Burton Lisa, 2014, FEDERAL LAW REV, V42, P253
[9]  
Burton Lisa, 2014, FEDERAL LAW REV, V42, P260
[10]  
Chief Justice J J Spigelman, 2010, AUSTR J PUBLIC ADM, V69, P351