PROGNOSTIC INDICATORS FOR EARLY-STAGE BREAST-CARCINOMA .2. VALUE OF CATHEPSIN-D EXPRESSION, DETECTED BY IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY - A MULTIPARAMETRIC STUDY

被引:0
作者
BEVILACQUA, P
BORACCHI, P
GASPARINI, G
机构
[1] ST BORTOLO REG MED CTR,DEPT ONCOL,I-36100 VICENZA,ITALY
[2] UNIV MILAN,NATL CANC INST,INST MED STAT & BIOMETRY,MILAN,ITALY
关键词
CATHEPSIN D; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; BREAST CANCER; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cathepsin D is a lysosomal aspartyl protease which seems to be involved in invasiveness and metastasis in breast carcinoma. Cathepsin D expression detected by immunocytochemistry is a new potentially useful prognostic marker. Additional research is warranted because: (i) few immunocytochemical studies have been performed to correlate cathepsin D expression and prognosis; (ii) a consensus has not yet been achieved on methodology and quality control issues; (iii) the association between cathepsin D expression and other new biological markers is poorly known and (iv) few studies have assessed whether cathepsin D expression is an independent prognostic marker when compared with other biological and clinico-pathological features using multivariate analysis. This study was undertaken in the same series of 165 stage I-II breast cancer patients (median follow-up of 5 years) already reported (Int J Oncol 4: 155-162, 1994) in whom cathepsin D was assessed using the D7E3 monoclonal antibody by immunocytochemistry in frozen specimens, using a standard peroxidase-antiperoxidase complex method. Cathepsin D was compared with another 7 biological markers, as well as with the conventional clinico-pathological features. Forty-two carcinomas of the 165 analyzed (25.5%) were cathepsin D-positive. This marker was significantly associated with c-erbB-2 expression (p=0.004) and tumour vascularization (p=0.02). Yet, a weak association was observed between cathepsin D and S-phase fraction (p=0.06). In univariate analysis cathepsin D was significantly associated both with relapse-free survival (p<0.01) and overall survival (p=0.02). In multivariate analysis, for relapse-free survival the variables cathepsin D/tumour vascularization, as well as S-phase fraction and EGFR, were significant and independent. For overall survival the variables cathepsin D/c-erbB-2 protein, as well as tumour vascularization and S-phase fraction were significant and independent. Immunocytochemical determination of cathepsin D, using the D7E3 antibody, seems to be a useful prognostic tool in early-stage breast cancer. In particular, cathepsin D adds prognostic information to tumour vascularization (in predicting relapse-free survival) and to c-erbB-2 expression (in predicting overall survival).
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 564
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
CAPONY F, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P3904
[2]  
DOMAGALA W, 1992, AM J PATHOL, V141, P1003
[3]   THE AXILLA - NOT A NO-GO ZONE [J].
FENTIMAN, IS ;
MANSEL, RE .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8735) :221-223
[4]   PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF PS2 AND CATHEPSIN-D IN 710 HUMAN PRIMARY BREAST-TUMORS - MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS [J].
FOEKENS, JA ;
VANPUTTEN, WLJ ;
PORTENGEN, H ;
DEKONING, HYWCM ;
THIRION, B ;
ALEXIEVAFIGUSCH, J ;
KLIJN, JGM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (05) :899-908
[5]   IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DETECTION OF THE ESTROGEN-REGULATED 52,000 MOL WT PROTEIN IN PRIMARY BREAST CANCERS BUT NOT IN NORMAL BREAST AND UTERUS [J].
GARCIA, M ;
SALAZARRETANA, G ;
RICHER, G ;
DOMERGUE, J ;
CAPONY, F ;
PUJOL, H ;
LAFFARGUE, F ;
PAU, B ;
ROCHEFORT, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1984, 59 (03) :564-566
[6]   EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL USEFULNESS OF NEW PROGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE INDICATORS IN NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS [J].
GASPARINI, G ;
POZZA, F ;
HARRIS, AL .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (15) :1206-1219
[7]   HUMAN BREAST-CANCER - PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF THE C-ERBB-2 ONCOPROTEIN COMPARED WITH EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR, DNA PLOIDY, AND CONVENTIONAL PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES [J].
GASPARINI, G ;
GULLICK, WJ ;
BEVILACQUA, P ;
SAINSBURY, JRC ;
MELI, S ;
BORACCHI, P ;
TESTOLIN, A ;
LAMALFA, G ;
POZZA, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (05) :686-695
[8]  
GASPARINI G, 1994, INT J ONCOL, V4, P155
[9]  
HENRY JA, 1990, CANCER, V65, P265, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900115)65:2<265::AID-CNCR2820650214>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-1