US versus European Approaches to Terrorism: Size Really Does Matter
被引:1
|
作者:
Oliverio, Annamarie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Arizona State Univ, Sch Justice & Social Inquiry Arts & Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USAArizona State Univ, Sch Justice & Social Inquiry Arts & Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
Oliverio, Annamarie
[1
]
机构:
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Justice & Social Inquiry Arts & Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
This article compares the European tendency toward 'conflict negotiation'with theUSA's conflict resolution/elimination' approach to terrorism. Historical/social experiences, political strategies and arsenal sizes impact their different perspectives on terrorism that also impact their different approach to managing Islamic terrorist threats. In the European Union, the Islamic threat is perceived differently from country to country. On the other hand, the USA generates a uniform ideological perspective. The USA has the military and diplomatic resources to fight for its interests abroad while also practicing isolationism in the homeland. Because of its close proximity to theMiddle East, its greater sensitivity to cultural differences in the area, its large, relatively unintegrated Muslim population and limited military resources, Europe is more willing to pursue a mixed strategy of appeasement and aggression within the homeland.
机构:
Univ Virginia, Lung Transplant Program, Charlottesville, VA USA
Univ Virginia, Dept Med, Charlottesville, VA USAUniv Virginia, Lung Transplant Program, Charlottesville, VA USA
Kilbourne, Sarah
Krupnick, Alexander Sasha
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Virginia, Dept Surg, Charlottesville, VA USAUniv Virginia, Lung Transplant Program, Charlottesville, VA USA
Krupnick, Alexander Sasha
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY,
2018,
155
(04):
: 1880
-
1881