IN SEARCH OF TRUE CAUSES - EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECT OF GROUP POTENTIAL AND GROUP-INTERACTION ON DECISION PERFORMANCE

被引:8
作者
SALAZAR, AJ
HIROKAWA, RY
PROPP, KM
JULIAN, KM
LEATHAM, GB
机构
[1] UNIV IOWA,DEPT COMMUN STUDIES,IOWA CITY,IA 52242
[2] NO ILLINOIS UNIV,DEPT COMMUN STUDIES,DE KALB,IL 60115
[3] UNIV AKRON,SCH SPEECH,AKRON,OH 44325
[4] UNIV HAWAII,SCH SPEECH COMMUN,HONOLULU,HI 96822
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00334.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The present investigation sought to obtain empirical data that either directly supports or refutes the popular assumption that communication is an essential element of effective decision making. Specifically, it reports three phases of study that attempt to determine whether the variance in group decision making is best accounted for by noninteraction or interaction sources. Phase 1 examines the relationship among group member ability, communication opportunity, and decision performance. Phase 2 examines the relationship among group member ability, qualities of group communication, and decision performance. Phase 3 examines the relationship among fulfillment of communication functions requisite to decision-making efficacy, group member ability, and decision performance. In Phase 1, a strong independent main effect for communication opportunity was found; whereas in Phase 2 we discovered classification and explanatory effects for three facets of interaction quality-''evaluation of task-relevant issues,'' ''goal-directed communication,'' and ''idea development''-and in Phase 3 no classification or explanatory effects for either of the communication functions examined was found. Open channels of communication and high quality task-oriented discussion that focused on issue evaluation and task accomplishment facilitated group performance in light of the effects of group potential.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 559
页数:31
相关论文
共 78 条
[41]   A COMPARISON OF INPUT-OUTPUT, PROCESS-OUTPUT, AND INPUT-PROCESS-OUTPUT MODELS OF SMALL-GROUP PROBLEM-SOLVING EFFECTIVENESS [J].
JARBOE, S .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1988, 55 (02) :121-142
[42]   GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE ON A SINGLE-STAGE TASK AS A FUNCTION OF DISTRIBUTION OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE [J].
JOHNSON, HH ;
TORCIVIA, JM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 3 (03) :266-273
[43]  
KANEKAR S, 1972, PSYCHON SCI, V27, P279
[44]   EFFECTS OF LEADERSHIP AND OTHER INPUTS ON GROUP PROCESSES AND OUTPUTS [J].
KATZELL, RA ;
MILLER, CE ;
ROTTER, NG ;
VENET, TG .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 80 (02) :157-&
[45]  
KLEINBAUM DG, 1988, APPLIED REGRESSION A
[46]   GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE ON TASKS REQUIRING IDEATIONAL PROFICIENCY (BRAINSTORMING) - REVIEW [J].
LAMM, H ;
TROMMSDORFF, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 3 (04) :361-388
[47]  
LANDSBERGER H A, 1955, J Abnorm Psychol, V51, P552, DOI 10.1037/h0043533
[48]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CERTAIN GROUP-PROCESS VARIABLES AND GROUP PROBLEM-SOLVING EFFICIENCY [J].
LANZETTA, JT ;
ROBY, TB .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 52 (01) :135-148
[49]   INDIVIDUAL VERSUS TETRADIC PERFORMANCE ON A COMPLEMENTARY TASK AS A FUNCTION OF INITIAL ABILITY LEVEL [J].
LAUGHLIN, PR ;
BRANCH, LG .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1972, 8 (02) :201-216
[50]   INDIVIDUAL VERSUS TRIADIC PERFORMANCE ON A UNIDIMENSIONAL COMPLEMENTARY TASK AS A FUNCTION OF INITIAL ABILITY LEVEL [J].
LAUGHLIN, PR ;
BRANCH, LG ;
JOHNSON, HH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 12 (02) :144-&