EFFECTS OF EXOGENOUS PORCINE SOMATOTROPIN (PST) ADMINISTRATION ON GROWTH-PERFORMANCE, CARCASS TRAITS, AND PORK MEAT QUALITY OF MEISHAN, PIETRAIN, AND CROSSBRED GILTS

被引:36
作者
BIDANEL, JP
BONNEAU, M
POINTILLART, A
GRUAND, J
MOUROT, J
DEMADE, I
机构
[1] INRA,RECH PORCINES STN,F-35590 HERMITAGE,FRANCE
[2] INRA,NUTR & SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE LAB,F-78352 JOUY EN JOSAS,FRANCE
[3] SMITHKLINE BEECHAM ANIM HLTH PROD,W CHESTER,PA 19380
关键词
PIGS; SOMATOTROPIN; GENOTYPES; BODY COMPOSITION; MEAT QUALITY;
D O I
10.2527/1991.6993511x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Seventeen to twenty-three females of lean (Pietrain, PI), fat (Meishan, MS), or intermediate genotype (PI x [3/4 Large White x 1/4 MS]), referred to as crossbred (CR), were injected between 60 and 100 kg live weight with 6 mg/d of porcine somatotropin (pST) and compared to similar numbers of control females receiving the vehicle only. Average daily gain increased similarly in the three genotypes (125 g/d). Feed conversion ratio tended to decrease to a higher extent in MS (-2.0 kg of feed/kg of gain) than in the other two genotypes (-1.1 and -.9 kg of feed/kg of gain for CR and PI, respectively). A significant genotype x treatment interaction was also observed for backfat thickness (BF) and fat, muscle, and bone development. Effects of pST in PI, CR, and MS pigs were, respectively, -6.2, -9.6, and -16.1 mm for BF and 3.0, 6.8, and 11.8% carcass muscle. The influence of pST on physical measurements of meat quality was rather low, although desirable effects (P < .05) were obtained on the reflectance and water-holding capacity of PI and CR. Intramuscular fat content was reduced by approximately 1% in MS and CR but not in PI. The metatarsals of pST-treated animals had a higher water content (except in PI), a lower mineralization, and a lower breaking strength (except in MS). The existence of breed variations in the response to pST might result in changes of the relative merit of crossbreeding schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:3511 / 3522
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] BARK LJ, 1989, J ANIM SCI S1, V67, P212
  • [2] BEERMANN D H, 1988, Journal of Animal Science, V66, P281
  • [3] Bidanel J. P., 1989, 21es Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France., P353
  • [4] Bidanel J.P., 1989, JOURNEES RECH PORCIN, V21, P361
  • [5] BONNEAU M, 1990, PIG NEWS INFO, V12, P39
  • [6] BONNEAU M, 1989, J REC PORC FRANCE, V21, P31
  • [7] BOYD RD, 1988, CURRENT CONCEPTS ANI
  • [8] CAMPBELL RG, 1990, J ANIM SCI, V68, P2674
  • [9] CAMPBELL RG, 1988, J ANIM SCI S1, V66, P257
  • [10] CAPERNA TJ, 1989, J ANIM SCI, V67, P654