Structural aspects of corporate governance and family firm performance: a systematic review

被引:33
作者
Azila-Gbettor, Edem M. [1 ,2 ]
Honyenuga, Ben Q. [2 ]
Berent-Braun, Marta M. [3 ]
Kil, Ad [4 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Heerlen, Netherlands
[2] Ho Tech Univ, Dept Management Sci, Ho, Ghana
[3] Nyenrode Business Univ, Ctr Entrepreneurship Governance & Stewardship, Breukelen, Netherlands
[4] Nyenrode Business Univ, Breukelen, Netherlands
关键词
Performance; Systematic review; Family firm; Corporate governance structures;
D O I
10.1108/JFBM-12-2017-0045
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to systematically review and examine extant knowledge on corporate governance structures (CGS) and performance relation within family firm and set the agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach - The study analyses the content of 159 empirical articles retrieved mainly from Google Scholar and published between 2000 and 2016 in 61 highly ranked journals across different disciplines. Findings - The review reveals fixation on quantitative approach and its associated techniques in examining CGS and performance nexus. The results from the review demonstrate heterogeneous relation between measures of CGS and performance. Suggestions for further studies include: measurement of non-economic performance of the family firm and incorporation of moderators and mediators from the organizations' environment through the adoption of multilevel research. Research limitations/implications - The limitations of this review include: first, issues relating to key/search terms and journals used for the study; this may not be exhaustive and hence likely to lead to omission of key publications. Second, scholarly attention in terms of empirical studies on family governance, including family council, family assembly and family constitution, has been scarce (Suess, 2014; Klein, 2008; Witt, 2008); hence family governance is outside the scope of this review. In sum, future work may explore other keywords and publications not used in this review and consider review of family governance. Originality/value - The authors offer a multidisciplinary conceptual framework that synthesizes and integrates the existing literature on CGS across different disciplines within family firms. This provides researchers across different disciplines a common platform for interdisciplinary discourse.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 330
页数:25
相关论文
共 183 条
[41]  
Chen Z., 2005, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V13, P431, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PACFIN.2004.12.001
[42]   Board size and the variability of corporate performance [J].
Cheng, Shijun .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (01) :157-176
[43]   Corporate Ownership Structure and Innovation: Evidence from Taiwan's Electronics Industry [J].
Chin, Chen-Lung ;
Chen, Yu-Ju ;
Kleinman, Gary ;
Lee, Picheng .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2009, 24 (01) :145-175
[44]   Is the Family an "Asset" or "Liability" for Firm Performance? The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism [J].
Chirico, Francesco ;
Bau, Massimo .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 52 (02) :210-225
[45]  
Chrisman J. J., 2010, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V36, P1
[46]   Management journals as venues for publication of family business research [J].
Chrisman, James J. ;
Chua, Jess H. ;
Kellermanns, Franz W. ;
Matherne, Curtis F., III ;
Debicki, Bart J. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2008, 32 (05) :927-934
[47]   VARIATIONS IN R&D INVESTMENTS OF FAMILY AND NONFAMILY FIRMS: BEHAVIORAL AGENCY AND MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION PERSPECTIVES [J].
Chrisman, James J. ;
Patel, Pankaj C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (04) :976-997
[48]  
CHRISMAN JJ, 1984, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V25, P59
[49]   A unified systems perspective of family firm performance: an extension and integration [J].
Chrisman, JJ ;
Chua, JH ;
Litz, R .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2003, 18 (04) :467-472
[50]   Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm [J].
Chrisman, JJ ;
Chua, JH ;
Sharma, P .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 29 (05) :555-575