DEFENSIVE ASPECTS OF BURROWING BEHAVIOR IN RATS (RATTUS-NORVEGICUS) - A DESCRIPTIVE AND CORRELATIONAL STUDY

被引:7
作者
KITAOKA, A [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TSUKUBA,INST PSYCHOL,TSUKUBA,IBARAKI 305,JAPAN
关键词
BURROWING; BURYING; DIGGING; OPEN-FIELD; PRE-ENCOUNTER DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR; SSDR; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TSUKUBA EMOTIONAL STRAINS; RAT;
D O I
10.1016/0376-6357(94)90034-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several burrowing behavioral characteristics of five different, genetically-biased, strains of rats (Rattus norvegicus), with each showing various defensive and open-field behaviors, were investigated to examine the defensive aspects of burrowing behavior. The strains used were the Tsukuba High- and Low-Emotional (THE and TLE), F344/DuCrj (F344), Long Evans (LE), and the Wistar-lmamichi/lar (WI). The THE and LE strains showed significantly shorter burrowing latency, more digging activity, and longer length burrows, with most rats escaping into their burrows at a loud crash sound. On the other hand, the TLE and WI stains displayed significantly longer burrowing latency, less digging activity, and shorter length burrows, with only a few rats escaping. These findings showed the consistency among the burrowing characteristics and a close relationship between burrowing and escape. The F344 strain, on the contrary, showed a shorter burrowing latency and more digging activity than the TLE and WI strains (although similar length burrows), yet few rats escaped. Digging, burying, open-field defecation, and re-emergence latency after escape correlated highly with each other, possibly suggesting their defensive nature. In conclusion, it is possible that burrowing behavior is a species-specific defense reaction (SSDR), yet factors involved in burrowing seem to be complicated, with more extensive studies therefore required.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 27
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   MOUSE (MUS) BURROWS - EFFECTS OF AGE, STRAIN, AND DOMESTICATION [J].
ADAMS, N ;
BOICE, R .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1981, 9 (01) :140-144
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   TESTS FOR EMOTIONALITY IN RATS AND MICE - REVIEW [J].
ARCHER, J .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1973, 21 (MAY) :205-235
[4]   RODENT SEX-DIFFERENCES IN EMOTIONAL AND RELATED BEHAVIOR [J].
ARCHER, J .
BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY, 1975, 14 (04) :451-479
[5]  
BARNETT SA, 1975, RAT STUDY BEHAVIOR
[6]   ETHOEXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO THE BIOLOGY OF EMOTION [J].
BLANCHARD, DC ;
BLANCHARD, RJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 39 :43-68
[7]   SEX EFFECTS IN DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR - BASE-LINE DIFFERENCES AND DRUG-INTERACTIONS [J].
BLANCHARD, DC ;
SHEPHERD, JK ;
CAROBREZ, AD ;
BLANCHARD, RJ .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1991, 15 (04) :461-468
[8]   22 KHZ ALARM CRIES TO PRESENTATION OF A PREDATOR, BY LABORATORY RATS LIVING IN VISIBLE BURROW SYSTEMS [J].
BLANCHARD, RJ ;
BLANCHARD, DC ;
AGULLANA, R ;
WEISS, SM .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1991, 50 (05) :967-972
[9]   SEX-DIFFERENCES IN THE INCIDENCE AND SONOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTIPREDATOR ULTRASONIC CRIES IN THE LABORATORY RAT (RATTUS-NORVEGICUS) [J].
BLANCHARD, RJ ;
AGULLANA, R ;
MCGEE, L ;
WEISS, S ;
BLANCHARD, DC .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 106 (03) :270-277
[10]   SOCIAL STRESS, MORTALITY AND AGGRESSION IN COLONIES AND BURROWING HABITATS [J].
BLANCHARD, RJ ;
BLANCHARD, DC ;
FLANNELLY, KJ .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1985, 11 (02) :209-213