ACCURACY OF AORTIC-STENOSIS SEVERITY ASSESSMENT BY DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY - IMPORTANCE OF IMAGE QUALITY

被引:18
作者
BARTUNEK, J [1 ]
DEBACQUER, D [1 ]
RODRIGUES, AC [1 ]
DEBRUYNE, B [1 ]
机构
[1] OLV ZIEKENHUIS,CTR CARDIOVASC,B-9300 AALST,BELGIUM
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIAC IMAGING | 1995年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTIC STENOSIS ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1007/BF01844707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to investigate which factors could influence the accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography in an unselected population. Doppler echocardiographic determination of mean transvalvular pressure gradient and aortic valve area by continuity equation was performed in 101 patients before catheterization. According to the catheterization data, aortic stenosis was classified into 2 categories: mild to moderate (orifice area [Gorlin formula] > 0.75 cm(2), mean transvalvular gradient < 50 mmHg) and severe (orifice area less than or equal to 0.75 cm(2), mean transvalvular gradient greater than or equal to 50 mmHg). The influence of eight factors on the absolute difference in aortic valve area and mean transvalvular pressure gradient and on the concordant classification in the same category by both methods was investigated. Results. By multivariate analysis, the absolute difference in aortic valve area by both methods was significantly associated with poor image quality, absolute difference between mean catheterization and Doppler transvalvular gradient and inversely related to body mass index. Absolute difference in mean transvalvular gradients by both methods was significantly associated only with image quality. Poor image quality emerged as the only significant factor influencing the concordant classification between invasive and noninvasive studies according to orifice area (but not according to transvalvular pressure gradient). Conclusion. Echographic image quality significantly influences the accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area and, to a lesser extent, of transvalvular pressure gradient. Therefore, the mere noninvasive approach is not suitable to every consecutive patient with aortic stenosis. Qualifications concerning overall image quality should identify patients most likely to benefit from catheterization.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   EFFECT OF STENOSIS GEOMETRY ON THE DOPPLER-CATHETER GRADIENT RELATION INVITRO - A MANIFESTATION OF PRESSURE RECOVERY [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
SCHIMA, H ;
TULZER, G ;
KUHN, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 21 (04) :1018-1025
[2]  
BRAUNWALD E, 1992, HEART DIS TXB CARDIO, P1039
[3]   ADVANCES IN THE HEMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF STENOTIC CARDIAC VALVES [J].
CARABELLO, BA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 10 (04) :912-919
[4]  
CARABELLO BA, 1992, CARDIAC CATHETERIZAT, P152
[5]   CONTINUOUS-WAVE DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY OF CALCIFIC AORTIC-STENOSIS - A SIMULTANEOUS DOPPLER-CATHETER CORRELATIVE STUDY IN 100 ADULT PATIENTS [J].
CURRIE, PJ ;
SEWARD, JB ;
REEDER, GS ;
VLIETSTRA, RE ;
BRESNAHAN, DR ;
BRESNAHAN, JF ;
SMITH, HC ;
HAGLER, DJ ;
TAJIK, AJ .
CIRCULATION, 1985, 71 (06) :1162-1169
[6]  
DANIELSEN R, 1988, BRIT HEART J, V59, P551
[7]   FACTORS AFFECTING DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC VALVE AREA ASSESSMENT IN AORTIC-STENOSIS [J].
DANIELSEN, R ;
NORDREHAUG, JE ;
VIKMO, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 63 (15) :1107-1111
[8]   IS PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-PRESSURE A SATISFACTORY SUBSTITUTE FOR ASCENDING AORTIC PRESSURE WHEN MEASURING AORTIC-VALVE GRADIENTS [J].
FOLLAND, ED ;
PARISI, AF ;
CARBONE, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 4 (06) :1207-1212
[9]   DETERMINATION OF SEVERITY OF VALVULAR AORTIC-STENOSIS BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND RELATION OF FINDINGS TO CLINICAL OUTCOME AND AGREEMENT WITH HEMODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS DETERMINED AT CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION [J].
GALAN, A ;
ZOGHBI, WA ;
QUINONES, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 67 (11) :1007-1012
[10]   HYDRAULIC FORMULA FOR CALCULATION OF THE AREA OF THE STENOTIC MITRAL VALVE, OTHER CARDIAC VALVES, AND CENTRAL CIRCULATORY SHUNTS .1. [J].
GORLIN, R ;
GORLIN, SG .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1951, 41 (01) :1-29