DELTA-DEGREES OF FREEDOM IN TRINUCLEI .2. THE HANNOVER DELTA-DELTA MODEL

被引:32
|
作者
PICKLESIMER, A
RICE, RA
BRANDENBURG, R
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV, DEPT PHYS, W LAFAYETTE, IN 47907 USA
[2] UNIV BASEL, INST PHYS, CH-3056 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW C | 1992年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevC.45.547
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
The effect of DELTA and DELTA-DELTA degrees of freedom on the triton binding energy (E(T)) is studied using the Hannover DELTA-DELTA-force model. The three-body system of interest extends through J less-than-or-equal-to 4, with L(N DELTA),L(DELTA-DELTA) less-than-or-equal-to 4. A series of preliminary investigations reduces this three-body problem to J less-than-or-equal-to 2, with L(N DELTA),L(DELTA-DELTA) less-than-or-equal-to 2, and a 110 keV attractive correction to E(T). These J less-than-or-equal-to 2 DELTA-DELTA-calculations reveal a repulsive dispersive effect of 930 keV and an attractive DELTA-DELTA-three-body force effect of 500 keV, in addition to the corresponding one-DELTA-effects of 550 and 920 keV, respectively. The total DELTA-induced dispersive effect is thus about 1480 keV, while the total DELTA-induced three-body force effect is about 1420 keV: DELTA effects on E(T) almost exactly cancel. The net DELTA-DELTA J less-than-or-equal-to 2 result is E(T) = 7.32 MeV, while the corresponding nucleons-only result is 7.38 MeV. Similarly, the net J less-than-or-equal-to 4 result is E(T) = 7.43 MeV, as compared to the corresponding nucleons-only result, 7.46 MeV. The Hannover DELTA-DELTA-force model is also examined for consistency with the two-body scattering parameters and is found to be somewhat defective in this regard. Thus, the important implications of these qualitative results for nuclear physics are to some extent dependent on confirmation using more sophisticated force models.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 562
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DELTA-DELTA REGGE TRAJECTORY AND NONDEGENERATE PARITY PARTNERS
    SIVERS, D
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1971, 4 (05): : 1444 - &
  • [22] An image database .2. Catalogue between delta=-30 degrees and delta=70 degrees
    Garnier, R
    Paturel, G
    Petit, C
    Marthinet, MC
    Rousseau, J
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1996, 117 (03): : 467 - 473
  • [23] HARD SCATTERING AND DELTA-DELTA EXCHANGE IN BACKWARD PHOTOPRODUCTION OF DELTA++PI-
    BARBER, DP
    DAINTON, JB
    LEE, LCY
    MARSHALL, R
    THOMPSON, JC
    WILLIAMS, DT
    BRODBECK, TJ
    FROST, G
    NEWTON, D
    PATRICK, GN
    PEARCE, GF
    SLOAN, T
    BROOKES, GR
    HAYNES, WJ
    WILKES, PB
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1981, 98 (1-2) : 135 - 139
  • [24] POSSIBLE EXISTENCE OF A DEEPLY BOUND DELTA-DELTA SYSTEM
    KAMAE, T
    FUJITA, T
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1977, 38 (09) : 471 - 475
  • [25] Bangladeshi Dialect Recognition using Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient, Delta, Delta-delta and Gaussian Mixture Model
    Das, Pronaya Prosun
    Allayear, Shaikh Muhammad
    Amin, Ruhul
    Rahman, Zahida
    2016 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (ICACI), 2016, : 359 - 364
  • [26] ON THE RELEVANCE OF DELTA-DELTA AND NU-DELTA CORRELATIONS IN NUCLEAR-MATTER CALCULATIONS
    CENNI, R
    SARACCO, P
    MATIN, MA
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA A-NUCLEI PARTICLES AND FIELDS, 1991, 104 (12): : 1735 - 1746
  • [27] LANDAU-MIGDAL PARAMETERS G'N, G'-DELTA AND G'-DELTA-DELTA IN THE PI+RHO MODEL
    HOSAKA, A
    TOKI, H
    PROGRESS OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 76 (06): : 1306 - 1320
  • [28] ENERGY-WEIGHTED M1 SUM-RULE WITH EXPLICIT DELTA-DEGREES OF FREEDOM
    ARENHOVEL, H
    GIANNINI, MM
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1985, 436 (04) : 699 - 716
  • [29] EIKONAL-MODEL ANALYSIS OF THE REACTIONS PI-N-]P-DELTA NN-]N-DELTA(DELTA-DELTA), AND NN-]DELTA-BAR-DELTA
    DUBOVIKOV, MS
    ZAKHAROV, BG
    SERGEEV, VN
    SOVIET JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS-USSR, 1979, 29 (03): : 380 - 385
  • [30] ONE BOSON EXCHANGE N-N, N-DELTA AND DELTA-DELTA INTERACTION FROM QUARK POTENTIAL MODEL
    LU, ZC
    YU, YW
    COMMUNICATIONS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 9 (01) : 41 - 49