A COMMON PHYSICAL BASIS FOR THE GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER AND THE ACTION OF SUCRALFATE

被引:12
|
作者
HILLS, BA
机构
[1] Department of Physiology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0002-9343(91)90450-C
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A novel explanation for the action of sucralfate in gastric ulcers has been proposed based on a new theory for gastric mucosal protection derived, in effect, from the very common industrial practice of adsorbing surfactants to surfaces needing protection against acid. Standard physical tests have been employed to show that sucralfate is highly surface-active at both liquid and solid interfaces, with the capability to be adsorbed-but not as active as the indigenous surface-active phospholipid (SAPL). This finding can explain the ability of sucralfate to "bind" to an ulcer site. Unlike SAPL or surfactants in general, adsorbed sucralfate does not render hydrophilic surfaces hydrophobic, suggesting a dual role in substituting for both SAPL and the mucus needed to stabilize it. Electron microscopy, using a novel fixation procedure specifically designed to allow for the known properties of any gastric mucosal barrier, revealed essentially the same oligolamellar lining of SAPL as previously reported in rats. Prolonged (16-day) exposure to sucralfate did not appear to change the situation, whereas there were as many, if not more, lamellar bodies (freshly secreted SAPL) adjacent to the stomach wall. Mucus-free oxyntic ducts showed the same oligolamellar lining as controls. An interesting new finding was the presence of oligolamellar SAPL as the intergranular matrix of gastric mucus-as though preparing to protect the next layer in anticipation of the surface mucin granules being eroded.
引用
收藏
页码:S43 / S51
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF SUCRALFATE (SC) ON GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER
    HARRINGTON, SJ
    CODE, CF
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1980, 78 (05) : 1179 - 1179
  • [2] A PHYSICAL IDENTITY FOR THE GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER
    HILLS, BA
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1990, 153 (02) : 76 - 81
  • [3] THE GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER
    CLAMP, JR
    ENE, D
    METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 11 : 19 - 25
  • [4] GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER
    FROMM, D
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1979, 77 (02) : 396 - 397
  • [5] THE GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER
    STIEL, D
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1990, 153 (02) : 67 - 68
  • [6] THE GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER
    STERN, AI
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1985, 142 (03) : S9 - S10
  • [7] THE GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER
    MIEDERER, SE
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 33 (02) : 88 - 91
  • [8] THE GASTRIC-MUCOSAL BARRIER AND ULCERATION
    SILEN, W
    SCHIESSEL, R
    KIVILAAKSO, E
    BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1980, 5 : 3 - 6
  • [9] GASTRIC-MUCOSAL PROTECTION BY SUCRALFATE INVOLVES PHOSPHOINOSITIDES PARTICIPATION
    SLOMIANY, A
    MIZUTA, K
    PIOTROWSKI, J
    NISHIKAWA, H
    SLOMIANY, BL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1990, 22 (10): : 1179 - 1183
  • [10] EFFECT OF SUCRALFATE ON GASTRIC-MUCOSAL CALCIUM CHANNELS ACTIVITY
    LIU, J
    SLOMIANY, A
    SLOMIANY, BL
    GENERAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 23 (06): : 1129 - 1133