PUBLICITY AND PRICELESSNESS - GRASS-ROOTS DECISION-MAKING AND JUSTICE IN RATIONING

The ''grassroots turn'' in bioethical discussions about justice in allocation of health care resources has attracted a great deal of support; in the absence of a convincing theory of justice in rationing, democratic decision-making concerning priority setting emerges with a kind of inevitability. Yet there remain suspicions about this approach - most importantly, worries about the socially corrosive impact of explicit, public decisionmaking that in effect sets a price on the lives of persons. These worries have been quieted, particularly by the work of Leonard Fleck, but not altogether stilled. I explore more sympathetically the ideals to which concerns about public rationing somewhat dimly respond, and suggest constraints on priority setting discussions which might accommodate those ideals rather better.