Optimal In Situ Bioremediation Design of Groundwater Contaminated with Dissolved Petroleum Hydrocarbons

被引:12
|
作者
Akbarnejad-Nesheli, Sara [1 ]
Haddad, Omid Bozorg [1 ]
Loaiciga, Hugo A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Dept Irrigat & Reclamat Engn, Tehran 1193653471, Iran
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Geog, Santa Barbara, CA USA
关键词
Groundwater; In situ bioremediation; Multiobjective; Sum of squared cleanup standard violations; Sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000304
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aquifers are one of the main water supply resources for drinking, agricultural, and industrial purposes. Therefore, it is crucial to study and evaluate different remediation methodologies that can be used to enhance the quality of groundwater. In situ bioremediation is one of the most efficient and cost-effective cleanup methodologies to treat groundwater pollution. This methodology relies on the microorganisms of a contaminated aquifer to treat polluted groundwater. This paper presents a multiobjective simulation-optimization (S-O) model to achieve the best in situ bioremediation system design for a groundwater with contaminated dissolved hydrocarbons. Minimizing the design and operational costs along with the sum of squared cleanup standard violations (SCSV) are the two main objectives of this study. The results of optimization are presented in the form of Pareto possibility frontiers. A model from the literature and a nondominated sorting genetic algorithm are used for groundwater simulation and optimization, respectively, in this work. Single-objective and multiobjective cleanup optimized designs were obtained. The results of the single-objective design confirmed the capability and accuracy of the developed S-O model. The multiobjective optimization results yielded a Pareto frontier that can be used by regulators to select the best design tradeoff between the cleanup standard requirements and the financial resources. For example, an optimal option that reduces total cost about 51.3% increases the SCSV about 1.9%. Moreover, the option that increases the SCSV by about 12.6% decreases the total cost equal to 76.2%. A sensitivity analysis was performed for some of the bioremediation parameters such as hydraulic conductivity, initial oxygen concentration, injected oxygen concentration, remediation time, and the ratio of oxygen to hydrocarbon consumed. The results show that the hydraulic conductivity and remediation time had the most impact on the effectiveness of the bioremediation operation. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater at an UMTRA site
    Nuttall, HE
    Lutze, W
    Barton, LL
    Wolfrom, JH
    IN SITU AND ON-SITE BIOREMEDIATION, VOL 1, 1997, 4(1) (01): : 435 - 440
  • [22] In-situ bioremediation of chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater
    Willershausen, H
    Maxin, C
    Kohlmeier, E
    CONTAMINATED SOIL '98, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 435 - 443
  • [23] Biodegradation of Isoprenoids, Steranes, Terpanes, and Phenanthrenes During In Situ Bioremediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Groundwater
    Beskoski, Vladimir P.
    Miletic, Srdjan
    Ilic, Mila
    Gojgic-Cvijovic, Gordana
    Papic, Petar
    Maric, Nenad
    Solevic-Knudsen, Tatjana
    Jovancicevic, Branimir S.
    Nakano, Takeshi
    Vrvic, Miroslav M.
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2017, 45 (02)
  • [24] An overview of in situ remediation for groundwater co-contaminated with heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons
    Yuan, Luzi
    Wang, Kun
    Zhao, Qingliang
    Yang, Lin
    Wang, Guangzhi
    Jiang, Miao
    Li, Lili
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 349
  • [25] Multiscale computational techniques for optimal groundwater in-situ bioremediation design
    Liu, Y
    Minsker, BS
    Saied, F
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN WATER RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2: COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR SUBSURFACE FLOW AND TRANSPORT - COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, SURFACE WATER SYSTEMS AND HYDROLOGY, 2000, : 541 - 545
  • [26] Comparison of ex situ and in situ bioremediation of unsaturated soils contaminated by petroleum
    Carberry, JB
    Wik, J
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 36 (08): : 1491 - 1503
  • [27] An In Situ Bioreactor for the Treatment of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
    Key, Katherine
    Sublette, Kerry
    Johannes, Tyler
    Raes, Eric
    Sullivan, Edward
    Duba, James
    Ogles, Dora
    Baldwin, Brett
    Biernacki, Anita
    REMEDIATION-THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP COSTS TECHNOLOGIES & TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03): : 55 - 84
  • [28] Strategies for in situ bioremediation of chlorinated solvent contaminated groundwater
    McCarty, P.L.
    IAHS-AISH Publication, 2002, (275): : 319 - 324
  • [29] Strategies for in situ bioremediation of chlorinated solvent contaminated groundwater
    McCarty, PL
    GROUNDWATER QUALITY: NATURAL AND ENHANCED RESTORATION OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION, 2002, (275): : 319 - 324
  • [30] Assessment of In Situ Bioremediation of Oil Contaminated Soil and Groundwater in a Petroleum Refinery: A Laboratory Soil Column Study
    Zargar, M.
    Sarrafzadeh, M. H.
    Taheri, B.
    Keshavarz, A.
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 32 (13) : 1553 - 1561