PEDIATRIC THORACOSCOPY - WHERE HAVE WE COME AND WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED

被引:19
|
作者
RODGERS, BM
机构
[1] Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Medical Center, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 1993年 / 56卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0003-4975(93)90958-K
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The procedure of thoracoscopy was employed in adult patients for more than half a century before the first report evaluating its use in children was published in 1976. Initially thoracoscopy was proposed as a technique for obtaining pulmonary biopsy specimens in immunocompromised children when interstitial pneumonia developed, but, as more experience with the technique was gained, new indications for its use in children have arisen. A review of the published reports on the use of thoracoscopy in children has brought to light areas in which the procedure has been particularly useful as well as several limitations of the procedure. In properly selected patients, thoracoscopy is an extremely accurate method of tissue diagnosis for diffuse and localized pulmonary infiltrates. This technique may be the procedure of choice in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions in children and in the surgical treatment of empyema and pneumothorax. Most of the morbidity and mortality reported for the procedure have been in patients with diffuse interstitial pneumonias. Such patients, who are on high-pressure ventilator support, are best managed by a standard open lung biopsy. Maintenance of a sufficient pneumothorax has proved difficult in very small infants and children, and the procedure may not be applicable in children who weigh under 8 kg. Refinements in thoracoscopy instrumentation will allow the performance of more complicated surgical dissections as pediatric surgeons acquire more familiarity with this technique.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 707
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safer food packaging: What we have learned and where we have come
    Cheeseman, Mitchell
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [2] Where we have been, what we have learned and where we are going
    Heermann, DF
    NATIONAL IRRIGATION SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 40 - 51
  • [3] Heterosis - What have we learned? What have we done? Where are we headed?
    Hallauer, AR
    GENETICS AND EXPLOITATION OF HETEROSIS IN CROPS, 1999, : 483 - 492
  • [4] 'Where Have We Come From, What Are We, Where Are We Going?'
    Thrasher, C
    PARIS REVIEW, 2002, (162): : 237 - 237
  • [5] Comorbidity: What have we learned and where are we going?
    Mueser, Kim T.
    Drake, Robert E.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2007, 14 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [6] 'Where We Have Come'
    Ludvigson, S
    GEORGIA REVIEW, 1997, 51 (04): : 696 - 699
  • [7] Structural MRI of Pediatric Brain Development: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Going?
    Giedd, Jay N.
    Rapoport, Judith L.
    NEURON, 2010, 67 (05) : 728 - 734
  • [8] Imaging in osteoarthritis: what have we learned and where are we going?
    Hayashi, D.
    Guermazi, A.
    Crema, M. D.
    Roemer, F. W.
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2011, 102 (01) : 15 - 32
  • [9] Slow Light: what we have learned and where are we going
    Sharping, Jay E.
    2008 JOINT CONFERENCE OF THE OPTO-ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE AND THE AUSTRALIAN CONFERENCE ON OPTICAL FIBRE TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 37 - 38
  • [10] RNA modifications: what have we learned and where are we headed?
    Frye, Michaela
    Jaffrey, Samie R.
    Pan, Tao
    Rechavi, Gideon
    Suzuki, Tsutomu
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2016, 17 (06) : 365 - 372